MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are both processors that offer competitive specifications for different needs.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it features a total of 8 cores with a combination of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor is built on a 12 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 comes with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. This processor boasts a 7 nm lithography process and a TDP of 10 watts. Like the Unisoc Tiger T610, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
In terms of architecture, the Tiger T610 has a greater number of cores with a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. This could potentially lead to better multitasking and performance efficiency.
However, the Dimensity 800 stands out with its 7 nm lithography process, which offers improved power efficiency and potentially better overall performance. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU enhances its AI capabilities, making it suitable for tasks that require machine learning or AI processing.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T610 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 depends on the specific requirements of the user. If a higher number of cores and multitasking capability is essential, the Tiger T610 may be the preferred choice. However, if power efficiency, overall performance, and AI processing are the priorities, the Dimensity 800 could be a more suitable option.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it features a total of 8 cores with a combination of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor is built on a 12 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 comes with 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. This processor boasts a 7 nm lithography process and a TDP of 10 watts. Like the Unisoc Tiger T610, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Additionally, the Dimensity 800 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
In terms of architecture, the Tiger T610 has a greater number of cores with a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. This could potentially lead to better multitasking and performance efficiency.
However, the Dimensity 800 stands out with its 7 nm lithography process, which offers improved power efficiency and potentially better overall performance. Additionally, the inclusion of an NPU enhances its AI capabilities, making it suitable for tasks that require machine learning or AI processing.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T610 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 depends on the specific requirements of the user. If a higher number of cores and multitasking capability is essential, the Tiger T610 may be the preferred choice. However, if power efficiency, overall performance, and AI processing are the priorities, the Dimensity 800 could be a more suitable option.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| Shaders | 64 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 June |
| Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | T610 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio P90
2
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
3
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Apple A11 Bionic
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
6
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
7
Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tiger T618
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Google Tensor G1
9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
10
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Samsung Exynos 2100