MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors that offer different capabilities and specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features a total of four CPU cores. The architecture of this processor includes one 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and three 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a lithography of 12 nm, this processor is designed to provide efficient power consumption and performance. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, allowing compatibility with a wide range of applications and software.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 800, this processor also consists of four CPU cores. However, it has a different architecture compared to the Tiger T310. It includes four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 800 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, which generally results in better power efficiency and performance. Additionally, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 10 Watts, indicating its power consumption. Notably, the Dimensity 800 also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances the device's AI capabilities.
Comparing the two processors, the Dimensity 800 offers a more powerful architecture with higher clock speeds for its CPU cores. Having four Cortex-A76 cores can result in improved performance for tasks that require more processing power. Additionally, the 7 nm lithography further contributes to the Dimensity 800's superior efficiency and performance compared to the 12 nm lithography of the Tiger T310.
While both processors support the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the Dimensity 800 stands out with its inclusion of an NPU. This neural processing unit enables the processor to handle AI-related tasks more effectively, potentially leading to better AI performance and capabilities on devices that make use of this processor.
To summarize, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of architecture, lithography, power efficiency, and AI capabilities. However, the specific requirements and intended usage scenarios should be considered when choosing between these processors, as both may have their strengths in different areas.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features a total of four CPU cores. The architecture of this processor includes one 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and three 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a lithography of 12 nm, this processor is designed to provide efficient power consumption and performance. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, allowing compatibility with a wide range of applications and software.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 800, this processor also consists of four CPU cores. However, it has a different architecture compared to the Tiger T310. It includes four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 800 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm lithography process, which generally results in better power efficiency and performance. Additionally, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating of 10 Watts, indicating its power consumption. Notably, the Dimensity 800 also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances the device's AI capabilities.
Comparing the two processors, the Dimensity 800 offers a more powerful architecture with higher clock speeds for its CPU cores. Having four Cortex-A76 cores can result in improved performance for tasks that require more processing power. Additionally, the 7 nm lithography further contributes to the Dimensity 800's superior efficiency and performance compared to the 12 nm lithography of the Tiger T310.
While both processors support the same ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the Dimensity 800 stands out with its inclusion of an NPU. This neural processing unit enables the processor to handle AI-related tasks more effectively, potentially leading to better AI performance and capabilities on devices that make use of this processor.
To summarize, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of architecture, lithography, power efficiency, and AI capabilities. However, the specific requirements and intended usage scenarios should be considered when choosing between these processors, as both may have their strengths in different areas.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 April |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | T310 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
2
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
3
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
4
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
7
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
8
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Samsung Exynos 2200
10
Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080