MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The Unisoc SC9832E and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors with different specifications. The Unisoc SC9832E has a lower clock speed, operating at 1.4 GHz, compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800, which operates at a higher clock speed of 2.0 GHz. The Unisoc SC9832E has 4 cores, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 also has 4 cores. Both processors use the ARMv8-A instruction set and have an architecture based on Cortex cores. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 uses a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, providing a more powerful performance compared to the Cortex-A53 cores used in the Unisoc SC9832E.
In terms of manufacturing process, the Unisoc SC9832E is fabricated using a 28 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 adopts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. This indicates that the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is more power efficient and can deliver better performance per watt compared to the Unisoc SC9832E.
Another notable difference is the inclusion of a neural processing unit (NPU) in the MediaTek Dimensity 800. This allows the processor to perform AI-related tasks at a faster pace and with more efficiency, making it suitable for applications that require artificial intelligence capabilities.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc SC9832E has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watts, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This means that the Unisoc SC9832E is more power efficient and generates less heat compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a more advanced architecture, faster clock speed, and power-efficient manufacturing process compared to the Unisoc SC9832E. The inclusion of an NPU further enhances its capabilities in AI-related tasks. However, the Unisoc SC9832E may be more suitable for applications that prioritize power efficiency and generate less heat.
In terms of manufacturing process, the Unisoc SC9832E is fabricated using a 28 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 adopts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. This indicates that the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is more power efficient and can deliver better performance per watt compared to the Unisoc SC9832E.
Another notable difference is the inclusion of a neural processing unit (NPU) in the MediaTek Dimensity 800. This allows the processor to perform AI-related tasks at a faster pace and with more efficiency, making it suitable for applications that require artificial intelligence capabilities.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc SC9832E has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watts, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This means that the Unisoc SC9832E is more power efficient and generates less heat compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a more advanced architecture, faster clock speed, and power-efficient manufacturing process compared to the Unisoc SC9832E. The inclusion of an NPU further enhances its capabilities in AI-related tasks. However, the Unisoc SC9832E may be more suitable for applications that prioritize power efficiency and generate less heat.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 2 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 1 |
| Shaders | 64 | 4 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 13MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2018 |
| Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
3
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Helio G90
4
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
5
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
6
HiSilicon Kirin 9000S vs MediaTek Helio P22
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Helio P70
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
9
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
10
MediaTek MT6739 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425