MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The Unisoc SC9832E and MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors with different specifications. The Unisoc SC9832E has a lower clock speed, operating at 1.4 GHz, compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800, which operates at a higher clock speed of 2.0 GHz. The Unisoc SC9832E has 4 cores, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 also has 4 cores. Both processors use the ARMv8-A instruction set and have an architecture based on Cortex cores. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 uses a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, providing a more powerful performance compared to the Cortex-A53 cores used in the Unisoc SC9832E.
In terms of manufacturing process, the Unisoc SC9832E is fabricated using a 28 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 adopts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. This indicates that the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is more power efficient and can deliver better performance per watt compared to the Unisoc SC9832E.
Another notable difference is the inclusion of a neural processing unit (NPU) in the MediaTek Dimensity 800. This allows the processor to perform AI-related tasks at a faster pace and with more efficiency, making it suitable for applications that require artificial intelligence capabilities.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc SC9832E has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watts, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This means that the Unisoc SC9832E is more power efficient and generates less heat compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a more advanced architecture, faster clock speed, and power-efficient manufacturing process compared to the Unisoc SC9832E. The inclusion of an NPU further enhances its capabilities in AI-related tasks. However, the Unisoc SC9832E may be more suitable for applications that prioritize power efficiency and generate less heat.
In terms of manufacturing process, the Unisoc SC9832E is fabricated using a 28 nm lithography, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 adopts a more advanced 7 nm lithography. This indicates that the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is more power efficient and can deliver better performance per watt compared to the Unisoc SC9832E.
Another notable difference is the inclusion of a neural processing unit (NPU) in the MediaTek Dimensity 800. This allows the processor to perform AI-related tasks at a faster pace and with more efficiency, making it suitable for applications that require artificial intelligence capabilities.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc SC9832E has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watts, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This means that the Unisoc SC9832E is more power efficient and generates less heat compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has a more advanced architecture, faster clock speed, and power-efficient manufacturing process compared to the Unisoc SC9832E. The inclusion of an NPU further enhances its capabilities in AI-related tasks. However, the Unisoc SC9832E may be more suitable for applications that prioritize power efficiency and generate less heat.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 2 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 1 |
| Shaders | 64 | 4 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 13MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2018 |
| Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P22 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
2
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs MediaTek MT6739
3
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Samsung Exynos 8895
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
5
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
7
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
8
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4)
10
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Apple A16 Bionic