MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors that offer different specifications and features. Let's compare them based on their specifications:
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has four cores consisting of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 has a total of eight cores, with 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has a more powerful CPU configuration with higher clock speeds and newer Cortex-A78 architecture compared to the Dimensity 800.
Both processors have an Instruction Set of ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility with the latest software and applications. However, the Dimensity 800 is built on a 7 nm lithography process, while the Dimensity 920 utilizes a smaller 6 nm lithography process. This means that the Dimensity 920 is more advanced in terms of manufacturing technology, potentially leading to improved power efficiency and better overall performance.
Regarding the Thermal Design Power (TDP), both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating similar power consumption levels. This ensures that neither processor will drain excessive power, which is important for battery life in mobile devices.
Lastly, both the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 feature Neural Processing Units (NPU). These NPUs enable enhanced AI capabilities, including improved performance in tasks such as image recognition and voice command processing.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 offers a more advanced CPU configuration with faster clock speeds and a more efficient lithography process compared to the Dimensity 800. These improvements could potentially lead to better overall performance and power efficiency. However, the Dimensity 800 still provides a competitive CPU architecture and includes the necessary features for AI processing. Depending on the specific requirements and budget, either processor can be a suitable choice for different devices and applications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has four cores consisting of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 has a total of eight cores, with 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has a more powerful CPU configuration with higher clock speeds and newer Cortex-A78 architecture compared to the Dimensity 800.
Both processors have an Instruction Set of ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility with the latest software and applications. However, the Dimensity 800 is built on a 7 nm lithography process, while the Dimensity 920 utilizes a smaller 6 nm lithography process. This means that the Dimensity 920 is more advanced in terms of manufacturing technology, potentially leading to improved power efficiency and better overall performance.
Regarding the Thermal Design Power (TDP), both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating similar power consumption levels. This ensures that neither processor will drain excessive power, which is important for battery life in mobile devices.
Lastly, both the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 feature Neural Processing Units (NPU). These NPUs enable enhanced AI capabilities, including improved performance in tasks such as image recognition and voice command processing.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 offers a more advanced CPU configuration with faster clock speeds and a more efficient lithography process compared to the Dimensity 800. These improvements could potentially lead to better overall performance and power efficiency. However, the Dimensity 800 still provides a competitive CPU architecture and includes the necessary features for AI processing. Depending on the specific requirements and budget, either processor can be a suitable choice for different devices and applications.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | MT6877T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2
Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 850
3
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Samsung Exynos 990
5
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Helio G80
6
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek Helio G36
7
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
9
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9820
10
MediaTek Helio G25 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000