MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors are two powerful chips with slightly different specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A and a lithography of 7 nm. However, there is a difference in the clock speeds of the CPU cores. The Dimensity 800 has four Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 has four Cortex-A76 cores running at a higher clock speed of 2.6 GHz, along with four Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This difference in clock speeds implies that the Dimensity 820 may offer better performance in tasks that require higher processing power.
Another difference between the chips lies in the number of CPU cores. The Dimensity 800 has a total of four cores, while the Dimensity 820 boasts eight cores in total. Having more cores can potentially improve multitasking capabilities and overall processing speed.
Both processors feature a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they are designed to operate within a specific power range. This allows for efficient power consumption and heat management.
Additionally, both processors come equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware component enhances AI performance, enabling tasks such as facial recognition, voice assistant, and machine learning.
Overall, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is a strong and capable processor, the Dimensity 820 offers some upgrades in terms of clock speed and the number of CPU cores. These improvements may result in enhanced performance and faster processing speeds for tasks that require higher computational power.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A and a lithography of 7 nm. However, there is a difference in the clock speeds of the CPU cores. The Dimensity 800 has four Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 has four Cortex-A76 cores running at a higher clock speed of 2.6 GHz, along with four Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This difference in clock speeds implies that the Dimensity 820 may offer better performance in tasks that require higher processing power.
Another difference between the chips lies in the number of CPU cores. The Dimensity 800 has a total of four cores, while the Dimensity 820 boasts eight cores in total. Having more cores can potentially improve multitasking capabilities and overall processing speed.
Both processors feature a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they are designed to operate within a specific power range. This allows for efficient power consumption and heat management.
Additionally, both processors come equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware component enhances AI performance, enabling tasks such as facial recognition, voice assistant, and machine learning.
Overall, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is a strong and capable processor, the Dimensity 820 offers some upgrades in terms of clock speed and the number of CPU cores. These improvements may result in enhanced performance and faster processing speeds for tasks that require higher computational power.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 5 |
Shaders | 64 | 80 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2020 May |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | MT6875 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
3
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
5
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
6
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
7
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Apple A15 Bionic
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
10
Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821