MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 processors are two powerful chips with slightly different specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A and a lithography of 7 nm. However, there is a difference in the clock speeds of the CPU cores. The Dimensity 800 has four Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 has four Cortex-A76 cores running at a higher clock speed of 2.6 GHz, along with four Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This difference in clock speeds implies that the Dimensity 820 may offer better performance in tasks that require higher processing power.
Another difference between the chips lies in the number of CPU cores. The Dimensity 800 has a total of four cores, while the Dimensity 820 boasts eight cores in total. Having more cores can potentially improve multitasking capabilities and overall processing speed.
Both processors feature a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they are designed to operate within a specific power range. This allows for efficient power consumption and heat management.
Additionally, both processors come equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware component enhances AI performance, enabling tasks such as facial recognition, voice assistant, and machine learning.
Overall, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is a strong and capable processor, the Dimensity 820 offers some upgrades in terms of clock speed and the number of CPU cores. These improvements may result in enhanced performance and faster processing speeds for tasks that require higher computational power.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A and a lithography of 7 nm. However, there is a difference in the clock speeds of the CPU cores. The Dimensity 800 has four Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 has four Cortex-A76 cores running at a higher clock speed of 2.6 GHz, along with four Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This difference in clock speeds implies that the Dimensity 820 may offer better performance in tasks that require higher processing power.
Another difference between the chips lies in the number of CPU cores. The Dimensity 800 has a total of four cores, while the Dimensity 820 boasts eight cores in total. Having more cores can potentially improve multitasking capabilities and overall processing speed.
Both processors feature a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, indicating that they are designed to operate within a specific power range. This allows for efficient power consumption and heat management.
Additionally, both processors come equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware component enhances AI performance, enabling tasks such as facial recognition, voice assistant, and machine learning.
Overall, while the MediaTek Dimensity 800 is a strong and capable processor, the Dimensity 820 offers some upgrades in terms of clock speed and the number of CPU cores. These improvements may result in enhanced performance and faster processing speeds for tasks that require higher computational power.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 5 |
Shaders | 64 | 80 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2020 May |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | MT6875 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
2
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
3
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Google Tensor G3
4
Samsung Exynos 1580 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
5
Apple M4 (iPad) vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
6
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Apple A15 Bionic
7
MediaTek Helio G96 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020
8
MediaTek Helio P35 vs MediaTek Helio G92 Max
9
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400