MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two processors with slightly different specifications.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800, it has a CPU architecture consisting of four Cortex-A76 cores with a clock speed of 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This processor uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Dimensity 800 is specified at 10 Watts. Additionally, it comes equipped with an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances AI-based tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 boasts a slightly different CPU architecture. It has two Cortex-A76 cores running at a higher clock speed of 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Dimensity 800, this processor also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it has a smaller lithography of 6 nm and a higher number of transistors, with a count of 12000 million. The TDP of the Dimensity 810 is specified at 8 Watts, making it more power-efficient than its counterpart. Like the Dimensity 800, the Dimensity 810 also features an NPU for improved AI-driven tasks.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 processors have some notable differences in their specifications. The Dimensity 810 has a faster clock speed on its high-performance cores, a smaller lithography, and a higher number of transistors, making it potentially more powerful than the Dimensity 800. However, it also has a lower TDP, making it more power-efficient. Both processors feature NPUs, which contribute to better AI functionality. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or device manufacturer.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800, it has a CPU architecture consisting of four Cortex-A76 cores with a clock speed of 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. This processor uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 7 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Dimensity 800 is specified at 10 Watts. Additionally, it comes equipped with an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances AI-based tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 boasts a slightly different CPU architecture. It has two Cortex-A76 cores running at a higher clock speed of 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the Dimensity 800, this processor also uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it has a smaller lithography of 6 nm and a higher number of transistors, with a count of 12000 million. The TDP of the Dimensity 810 is specified at 8 Watts, making it more power-efficient than its counterpart. Like the Dimensity 800, the Dimensity 810 also features an NPU for improved AI-driven tasks.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 processors have some notable differences in their specifications. The Dimensity 810 has a faster clock speed on its high-performance cores, a smaller lithography, and a higher number of transistors, making it potentially more powerful than the Dimensity 800. However, it also has a lower TDP, making it more power-efficient. Both processors feature NPUs, which contribute to better AI functionality. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or device manufacturer.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 8 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 2K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Unisoc Tiger T710
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
6
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
7
MediaTek Helio G95 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
8
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T310
10
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2