MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
The MediaTek Dimensity 800 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors that offer powerful performance and efficient processing capabilities. Let's compare their specifications to understand their differences and similarities.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration ensures efficient multitasking and smooth operation. The processor is built on a 7 nm lithography process, allowing for increased power efficiency. With a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, it balances performance and energy consumption effectively. Additionally, it incorporates an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) for enhanced AI and machine learning capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U offers a slightly different configuration. It showcases 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration suggests that it may deliver even better single-core performance due to the higher clock speed of the two A76 cores. It also carries the same 7 nm lithography process, ensuring energy efficiency. Similar to the Dimensity 800, it also incorporates an NPU for AI processing.
One notable difference between the two processors lies in the number of CPU cores. The Dimensity 800 features 4 cores, while the Dimensity 800U has 8 cores. This additional core count in the Dimensity 800U could potentially result in improved multitasking and better overall performance in situations that require more processing power.
Both processors share the same instruction set, which is ARMv8.2-A, and incorporate an NPU for AI processing capabilities. These similarities suggest that they offer similar AI performance and capabilities.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and Dimensity 800U processors have some differences in their CPU core configurations and number of cores. The Dimensity 800U may have an edge in terms of single-core performance due to its higher clock speed, while the Dimensity 800 may excel in multitasking scenarios due to its larger number of cores. However, both processors offer efficient processing and AI capabilities, making them suitable for a range of applications.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 800, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration ensures efficient multitasking and smooth operation. The processor is built on a 7 nm lithography process, allowing for increased power efficiency. With a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, it balances performance and energy consumption effectively. Additionally, it incorporates an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) for enhanced AI and machine learning capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U offers a slightly different configuration. It showcases 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration suggests that it may deliver even better single-core performance due to the higher clock speed of the two A76 cores. It also carries the same 7 nm lithography process, ensuring energy efficiency. Similar to the Dimensity 800, it also incorporates an NPU for AI processing.
One notable difference between the two processors lies in the number of CPU cores. The Dimensity 800 features 4 cores, while the Dimensity 800U has 8 cores. This additional core count in the Dimensity 800U could potentially result in improved multitasking and better overall performance in situations that require more processing power.
Both processors share the same instruction set, which is ARMv8.2-A, and incorporate an NPU for AI processing capabilities. These similarities suggest that they offer similar AI performance and capabilities.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and Dimensity 800U processors have some differences in their CPU core configurations and number of cores. The Dimensity 800U may have an edge in terms of single-core performance due to its higher clock speed, while the Dimensity 800 may excel in multitasking scenarios due to its larger number of cores. However, both processors offer efficient processing and AI capabilities, making them suitable for a range of applications.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 3 |
Shaders | 64 | 48 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6873, MT6873V | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
3
MediaTek Helio G96 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
4
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
5
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
6
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
8
Apple A11 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
9
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Unisoc Tiger T610