MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are two processors that have different specifications and attributes. Let's compare these processors based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of eight cores, this processor offers a balanced combination of high-performance and energy-efficient cores. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Additionally, it is equipped with a dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enhancing its capabilities for AI-related tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 features a CPU architecture comprising 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T710, it also offers eight cores, but with a different distribution. This processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set as well but boasts a more advanced lithography technology, as it is built on the 7 nm process.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc Tiger T710 does not disclose its TDP (Thermal Design Power), while the MediaTek Dimensity 720 specifies a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the latter processor may be more power-efficient, potentially leading to better battery life in devices it powers.
Both processors have Neural Processing Units (NPU), which indicates their ability to handle AI tasks efficiently. However, the Unisoc Tiger T710 features a dual NPU, suggesting it may offer enhanced AI capabilities compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 720's single NPU.
To summarize, the Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 720 processors have their own distinct specifications. The Unisoc Tiger T710 excels in terms of a dual NPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 720 benefits from a more advanced lithography technology and potential power efficiency advantages. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they are being considered for.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of eight cores, this processor offers a balanced combination of high-performance and energy-efficient cores. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. Additionally, it is equipped with a dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), enhancing its capabilities for AI-related tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 features a CPU architecture comprising 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T710, it also offers eight cores, but with a different distribution. This processor operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set as well but boasts a more advanced lithography technology, as it is built on the 7 nm process.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc Tiger T710 does not disclose its TDP (Thermal Design Power), while the MediaTek Dimensity 720 specifies a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the latter processor may be more power-efficient, potentially leading to better battery life in devices it powers.
Both processors have Neural Processing Units (NPU), which indicates their ability to handle AI tasks efficiently. However, the Unisoc Tiger T710 features a dual NPU, suggesting it may offer enhanced AI capabilities compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 720's single NPU.
To summarize, the Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 720 processors have their own distinct specifications. The Unisoc Tiger T710 excels in terms of a dual NPU, while the MediaTek Dimensity 720 benefits from a more advanced lithography technology and potential power efficiency advantages. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they are being considered for.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2019 |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
2
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
4
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
7
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
9
Apple A10X Fusion vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845