MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
When comparing the Unisoc Tiger T700 and the MediaTek Dimensity 720 processors, there are several important specifications to consider.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has 8 cores with a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 also has 8 cores, but with a 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency.
Both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing compatibility with modern software. However, the Dimensity 720 has an advantage in terms of lithography, as it is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the 12 nm process of the Tiger T700. The smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and performance.
Interestingly, both processors have the same Thermal Design Power (TDP) rating of 10 Watts, indicating similar power consumption and heat generation.
One notable difference between these processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 720. The NPU enhances the processor's capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, potentially providing better performance in these areas compared to the Tiger T700.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 comes out as a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700 due to its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography, and the addition of the NPU. However, specific performance and real-world benchmarks would be necessary to determine the extent of the performance gap between these two processors.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has 8 cores with a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 also has 8 cores, but with a 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency.
Both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing compatibility with modern software. However, the Dimensity 720 has an advantage in terms of lithography, as it is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the 12 nm process of the Tiger T700. The smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and performance.
Interestingly, both processors have the same Thermal Design Power (TDP) rating of 10 Watts, indicating similar power consumption and heat generation.
One notable difference between these processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 720. The NPU enhances the processor's capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, potentially providing better performance in these areas compared to the Tiger T700.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 comes out as a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700 due to its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography, and the addition of the NPU. However, specific performance and real-world benchmarks would be necessary to determine the extent of the performance gap between these two processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 2 |
| Shaders | 32 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 48MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 March |
| Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T700 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Apple M2 (iPad)
2
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
3
MediaTek Helio P70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400
4
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Helio A25
5
Unisoc SC7731E vs MediaTek Helio P22
6
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Apple A12 Bionic
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
9
Unisoc T8300 vs MediaTek Helio P65
10
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300