MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
When comparing the Unisoc Tiger T700 and the MediaTek Dimensity 720 processors, there are several important specifications to consider.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has 8 cores with a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 also has 8 cores, but with a 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency.
Both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing compatibility with modern software. However, the Dimensity 720 has an advantage in terms of lithography, as it is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the 12 nm process of the Tiger T700. The smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and performance.
Interestingly, both processors have the same Thermal Design Power (TDP) rating of 10 Watts, indicating similar power consumption and heat generation.
One notable difference between these processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 720. The NPU enhances the processor's capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, potentially providing better performance in these areas compared to the Tiger T700.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 comes out as a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700 due to its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography, and the addition of the NPU. However, specific performance and real-world benchmarks would be necessary to determine the extent of the performance gap between these two processors.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has 8 cores with a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 also has 8 cores, but with a 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency.
Both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing compatibility with modern software. However, the Dimensity 720 has an advantage in terms of lithography, as it is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the 12 nm process of the Tiger T700. The smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and performance.
Interestingly, both processors have the same Thermal Design Power (TDP) rating of 10 Watts, indicating similar power consumption and heat generation.
One notable difference between these processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 720. The NPU enhances the processor's capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, potentially providing better performance in these areas compared to the Tiger T700.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 comes out as a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700 due to its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography, and the addition of the NPU. However, specific performance and real-world benchmarks would be necessary to determine the extent of the performance gap between these two processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 March |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
2
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Apple A9
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
4
MediaTek Helio G25 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
6
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Samsung Exynos 1330
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 vs Samsung Exynos 7885
8
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Google Tensor G2
9
Apple M1 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
10
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350