MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
When comparing the Unisoc Tiger T700 and the MediaTek Dimensity 720 processors, there are several important specifications to consider.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has 8 cores with a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 also has 8 cores, but with a 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency.
Both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing compatibility with modern software. However, the Dimensity 720 has an advantage in terms of lithography, as it is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the 12 nm process of the Tiger T700. The smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and performance.
Interestingly, both processors have the same Thermal Design Power (TDP) rating of 10 Watts, indicating similar power consumption and heat generation.
One notable difference between these processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 720. The NPU enhances the processor's capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, potentially providing better performance in these areas compared to the Tiger T700.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 comes out as a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700 due to its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography, and the addition of the NPU. However, specific performance and real-world benchmarks would be necessary to determine the extent of the performance gap between these two processors.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has 8 cores with a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 also has 8 cores, but with a 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 architecture for high-performance tasks and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture for power efficiency.
Both processors use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing compatibility with modern software. However, the Dimensity 720 has an advantage in terms of lithography, as it is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm process compared to the 12 nm process of the Tiger T700. The smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and performance.
Interestingly, both processors have the same Thermal Design Power (TDP) rating of 10 Watts, indicating similar power consumption and heat generation.
One notable difference between these processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Dimensity 720. The NPU enhances the processor's capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks, potentially providing better performance in these areas compared to the Tiger T700.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 comes out as a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Unisoc Tiger T700 due to its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography, and the addition of the NPU. However, specific performance and real-world benchmarks would be necessary to determine the extent of the performance gap between these two processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 2 |
| Shaders | 32 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 48MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 March |
| Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T700 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Unisoc T820
3
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
4
MediaTek Helio G200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9010
5
HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
7
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Apple A11 Bionic
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Apple A17 Pro
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680