MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are two processors that offer high-performance capabilities for various devices. While they share similarities in terms of the number of cores, instruction set, TDP, and neural processing, there are notable differences in their architecture and lithography.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, it features a combination of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture allows for a balance between power and efficiency, making it suitable for multitasking and everyday tasks. With a lithography of 12 nm, the processor delivers decent performance while maintaining power efficiency. The T618 has a TDP of 10 Watts, ensuring that it operates within a reasonable power range. Additionally, it boasts an Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to handle AI-related tasks efficiently.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 offers a slightly upgraded architecture. It includes 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores for higher performance and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores for power efficiency. This combination makes it suitable for tasks that require more processing power, such as gaming and multimedia applications. The Dimensity 720 has a smaller lithography of 7 nm, which generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management. Like the T618, it also has a TDP of 10 Watts and an integrated NPU for AI-related tasks.
In summary, both processors bring significant capabilities to the table. The Unisoc Tiger T618 offers a balanced performance with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, while the MediaTek Dimensity 720 offers a higher-performance experience with its Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, the Dimensity 720 benefits from a smaller 7 nm lithography, potentially resulting in improved energy efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the device manufacturers and end-users.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, it features a combination of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture allows for a balance between power and efficiency, making it suitable for multitasking and everyday tasks. With a lithography of 12 nm, the processor delivers decent performance while maintaining power efficiency. The T618 has a TDP of 10 Watts, ensuring that it operates within a reasonable power range. Additionally, it boasts an Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to handle AI-related tasks efficiently.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 offers a slightly upgraded architecture. It includes 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores for higher performance and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores for power efficiency. This combination makes it suitable for tasks that require more processing power, such as gaming and multimedia applications. The Dimensity 720 has a smaller lithography of 7 nm, which generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management. Like the T618, it also has a TDP of 10 Watts and an integrated NPU for AI-related tasks.
In summary, both processors bring significant capabilities to the table. The Unisoc Tiger T618 offers a balanced performance with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, while the MediaTek Dimensity 720 offers a higher-performance experience with its Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, the Dimensity 720 benefits from a smaller 7 nm lithography, potentially resulting in improved energy efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the device manufacturers and end-users.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Helio G25
2
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Apple A10X Fusion
3
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
4
MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Helio P60
5
Samsung Exynos 980 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
7
Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
8
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
9
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821