MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are both processors designed for smartphones and other mobile devices. While they share some similarities in terms of their core count, instruction set, and power consumption, there are notable differences in their architecture and lithography.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a total of eight cores, comprised of two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor adopts the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured using a 12 nm lithography process. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, it is optimized for power efficiency.
In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 also boasts eight cores. It consists of two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. Similar to the Unisoc processor, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, one significant difference is the Dimensity 720's more advanced 7 nm lithography, which allows for improved power efficiency and performance. Additionally, the Dimensity 720 features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
In terms of raw processing power, the Dimensity 720 has a slight advantage due to its higher clock speeds and more advanced architecture. However, the difference in performance may not be immediately noticeable in everyday usage scenarios. Both processors have a TDP of 10 watts, meaning they are designed to operate efficiently without draining excessive battery power.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are capable processors suited for mid-range smartphones and other mobile devices. The Dimensity 720's 7 nm lithography and inclusion of an NPU give it a slight edge in terms of power efficiency and AI capabilities. However, the Tiger T612's usage of a 12 nm lithography should not be overlooked, as it still offers respectable performance and power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device's intended use.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a total of eight cores, comprised of two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor adopts the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured using a 12 nm lithography process. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts, it is optimized for power efficiency.
In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 also boasts eight cores. It consists of two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. Similar to the Unisoc processor, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, one significant difference is the Dimensity 720's more advanced 7 nm lithography, which allows for improved power efficiency and performance. Additionally, the Dimensity 720 features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
In terms of raw processing power, the Dimensity 720 has a slight advantage due to its higher clock speeds and more advanced architecture. However, the difference in performance may not be immediately noticeable in everyday usage scenarios. Both processors have a TDP of 10 watts, meaning they are designed to operate efficiently without draining excessive battery power.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T612 and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are capable processors suited for mid-range smartphones and other mobile devices. The Dimensity 720's 7 nm lithography and inclusion of an NPU give it a slight edge in terms of power efficiency and AI capabilities. However, the Tiger T612's usage of a 12 nm lithography should not be overlooked, as it still offers respectable performance and power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device's intended use.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 1 |
Shaders | 16 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
2
MediaTek Helio P65 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
4
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
5
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Helio G70
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs MediaTek Helio G88
7
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
8
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
9
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Apple A10X Fusion
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Unisoc Tiger T618