MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it utilizes an architecture with 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores, capable of handling multiple tasks simultaneously. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, it exemplifies energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 features an architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T606, it also has 8 cores, offering multitasking capabilities. It is built on a 7 nm lithography, which indicates superior power efficiency compared to the Unisoc Tiger T606. Additionally, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and boasts a TDP of 10 Watts. Moreover, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in handling tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In terms of performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 appears to have an advantage with its 7 nm lithography and higher clock speeds for both the Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 should not be disregarded as it still provides a reasonable performance with its 12 nm lithography and relatively lower clock speeds. Both processors offer efficiency with their 10 Watt TDP, indicating lower power consumption.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 showcases a more advanced and efficient architecture, thanks to its 7 nm lithography and inclusion of an NPU. However, depending on specific user requirements and budget, the Unisoc Tiger T606 can still be a capable choice for efficient multitasking and general processing tasks.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it utilizes an architecture with 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores, capable of handling multiple tasks simultaneously. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, it exemplifies energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 features an architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T606, it also has 8 cores, offering multitasking capabilities. It is built on a 7 nm lithography, which indicates superior power efficiency compared to the Unisoc Tiger T606. Additionally, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and boasts a TDP of 10 Watts. Moreover, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in handling tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In terms of performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 appears to have an advantage with its 7 nm lithography and higher clock speeds for both the Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 should not be disregarded as it still provides a reasonable performance with its 12 nm lithography and relatively lower clock speeds. Both processors offer efficiency with their 10 Watt TDP, indicating lower power consumption.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 showcases a more advanced and efficient architecture, thanks to its 7 nm lithography and inclusion of an NPU. However, depending on specific user requirements and budget, the Unisoc Tiger T606 can still be a capable choice for efficient multitasking and general processing tasks.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 1 |
Shaders | 16 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Helio P65
2
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
3
Apple A11 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T618
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
5
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
6
MediaTek Helio G90 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9010
7
Apple A9 vs Unisoc Tiger T620
8
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Apple M1 (iPad)
9
Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710