MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it utilizes an architecture with 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores, capable of handling multiple tasks simultaneously. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, it exemplifies energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 features an architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T606, it also has 8 cores, offering multitasking capabilities. It is built on a 7 nm lithography, which indicates superior power efficiency compared to the Unisoc Tiger T606. Additionally, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and boasts a TDP of 10 Watts. Moreover, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in handling tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In terms of performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 appears to have an advantage with its 7 nm lithography and higher clock speeds for both the Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 should not be disregarded as it still provides a reasonable performance with its 12 nm lithography and relatively lower clock speeds. Both processors offer efficiency with their 10 Watt TDP, indicating lower power consumption.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 showcases a more advanced and efficient architecture, thanks to its 7 nm lithography and inclusion of an NPU. However, depending on specific user requirements and budget, the Unisoc Tiger T606 can still be a capable choice for efficient multitasking and general processing tasks.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it utilizes an architecture with 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores, capable of handling multiple tasks simultaneously. It operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, it exemplifies energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 features an architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T606, it also has 8 cores, offering multitasking capabilities. It is built on a 7 nm lithography, which indicates superior power efficiency compared to the Unisoc Tiger T606. Additionally, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and boasts a TDP of 10 Watts. Moreover, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in handling tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In terms of performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 appears to have an advantage with its 7 nm lithography and higher clock speeds for both the Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606 should not be disregarded as it still provides a reasonable performance with its 12 nm lithography and relatively lower clock speeds. Both processors offer efficiency with their 10 Watt TDP, indicating lower power consumption.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 showcases a more advanced and efficient architecture, thanks to its 7 nm lithography and inclusion of an NPU. However, depending on specific user requirements and budget, the Unisoc Tiger T606 can still be a capable choice for efficient multitasking and general processing tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 1 |
Shaders | 16 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Helio G35
2
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Google Tensor G3
3
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
4
MediaTek Helio G90T vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
5
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
8
Unisoc SC9863A vs MediaTek Helio P35
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G95
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 710