MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Unisoc SC9832E
VS
The Unisoc SC9832E and MediaTek Dimensity 720 are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it is an architecture with four cores, each running at 1.4 GHz. The instruction set it supports is ARMv8-A. The processor is manufactured using a 28 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a more advanced architecture. It consists of two Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2 GHz. This processor has a total of eight cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The Dimensity 720 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm lithography process and has a TDP of 10 watts. Additionally, it features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for AI tasks.
In terms of core count and architecture, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 clearly surpasses the Unisoc SC9832E. With a total of eight cores, including the powerful Cortex-A76 cores, it is expected to deliver superior performance compared to the SC9832E's four Cortex-A53 cores.
The lithography process also plays a significant role in the efficiency and performance of the processors. The Dimensity 720's 7 nm process is more advanced than the SC9832E's 28 nm process, indicating that it will likely be more power-efficient and capable of delivering better overall performance.
Furthermore, the Dimensity 720's inclusion of an NPU further enhances its capabilities in handling AI-related tasks. The SC9832E does not specify any such neural processing capabilities.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of core count, architecture, lithography process, and additional features like the NPU. While the SC9832E may still be suitable for some applications, the Dimensity 720 offers better performance and efficiency, making it a more compelling choice for modern smartphones and other devices.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it is an architecture with four cores, each running at 1.4 GHz. The instruction set it supports is ARMv8-A. The processor is manufactured using a 28 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 has a more advanced architecture. It consists of two Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2 GHz. This processor has a total of eight cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The Dimensity 720 is manufactured using a more advanced 7 nm lithography process and has a TDP of 10 watts. Additionally, it features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities for AI tasks.
In terms of core count and architecture, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 clearly surpasses the Unisoc SC9832E. With a total of eight cores, including the powerful Cortex-A76 cores, it is expected to deliver superior performance compared to the SC9832E's four Cortex-A53 cores.
The lithography process also plays a significant role in the efficiency and performance of the processors. The Dimensity 720's 7 nm process is more advanced than the SC9832E's 28 nm process, indicating that it will likely be more power-efficient and capable of delivering better overall performance.
Furthermore, the Dimensity 720's inclusion of an NPU further enhances its capabilities in handling AI-related tasks. The SC9832E does not specify any such neural processing capabilities.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 720 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of core count, architecture, lithography process, and additional features like the NPU. While the SC9832E may still be suitable for some applications, the Dimensity 720 offers better performance and efficiency, making it a more compelling choice for modern smartphones and other devices.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 2 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 1 |
| Shaders | 4 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 1440x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 13MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2018 |
| Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Google Tensor G1
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
5
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
6
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs MediaTek Helio G25
7
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
8
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Helio G35
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Apple A16 Bionic
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Helio P70