MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The MediaTek Dimensity 720 and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors with unique specifications that cater to specific needs and requirements. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of architecture, both processors feature ARMv8.2-A instruction sets and have eight cores. However, the Dimensity 720 consists of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 920 boasts 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has slightly faster cores, potentially resulting in better overall performance and efficiency.
Another important factor to consider is the lithography, which affects the power consumption and heat generation of the processor. The Dimensity 720 has a 7 nm lithography, whereas the Dimensity 920 has a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally allows for better power efficiency and lower temperatures, potentially making the Dimensity 920 more desirable in terms of longevity and energy consumption.
Furthermore, both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, which suggests that they are designed to operate within similar power limits. However, it's crucial to note that TDP is not the sole indicator of power consumption, and other factors such as workload and device design can influence actual power usage.
Both the Dimensity 720 and Dimensity 920 feature an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities and supports various AI-related tasks. This can enable efficient performance in tasks such as image processing, voice recognition, and machine learning algorithms.
In conclusion, the Dimensity 920 offers improved processing power and superior lithography compared to the Dimensity 720. These specifications may result in enhanced performance and power efficiency, making the Dimensity 920 a more compelling choice for demanding tasks. However, it's important to consider other factors such as pricing, device compatibility, and user requirements before making a final decision.
In terms of architecture, both processors feature ARMv8.2-A instruction sets and have eight cores. However, the Dimensity 720 consists of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 920 boasts 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has slightly faster cores, potentially resulting in better overall performance and efficiency.
Another important factor to consider is the lithography, which affects the power consumption and heat generation of the processor. The Dimensity 720 has a 7 nm lithography, whereas the Dimensity 920 has a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally allows for better power efficiency and lower temperatures, potentially making the Dimensity 920 more desirable in terms of longevity and energy consumption.
Furthermore, both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, which suggests that they are designed to operate within similar power limits. However, it's crucial to note that TDP is not the sole indicator of power consumption, and other factors such as workload and device design can influence actual power usage.
Both the Dimensity 720 and Dimensity 920 feature an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities and supports various AI-related tasks. This can enable efficient performance in tasks such as image processing, voice recognition, and machine learning algorithms.
In conclusion, the Dimensity 920 offers improved processing power and superior lithography compared to the Dimensity 720. These specifications may result in enhanced performance and power efficiency, making the Dimensity 920 a more compelling choice for demanding tasks. However, it's important to consider other factors such as pricing, device compatibility, and user requirements before making a final decision.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 4 |
Shaders | 96 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | MT6877T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
3
Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 980
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
5
Apple A10X Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 7880
6
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
7
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Apple A11 Bionic
9
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
10
Apple A13 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 990