MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The MediaTek Dimensity 720 and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors with unique specifications that cater to specific needs and requirements. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
In terms of architecture, both processors feature ARMv8.2-A instruction sets and have eight cores. However, the Dimensity 720 consists of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 920 boasts 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has slightly faster cores, potentially resulting in better overall performance and efficiency.
Another important factor to consider is the lithography, which affects the power consumption and heat generation of the processor. The Dimensity 720 has a 7 nm lithography, whereas the Dimensity 920 has a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally allows for better power efficiency and lower temperatures, potentially making the Dimensity 920 more desirable in terms of longevity and energy consumption.
Furthermore, both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, which suggests that they are designed to operate within similar power limits. However, it's crucial to note that TDP is not the sole indicator of power consumption, and other factors such as workload and device design can influence actual power usage.
Both the Dimensity 720 and Dimensity 920 feature an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities and supports various AI-related tasks. This can enable efficient performance in tasks such as image processing, voice recognition, and machine learning algorithms.
In conclusion, the Dimensity 920 offers improved processing power and superior lithography compared to the Dimensity 720. These specifications may result in enhanced performance and power efficiency, making the Dimensity 920 a more compelling choice for demanding tasks. However, it's important to consider other factors such as pricing, device compatibility, and user requirements before making a final decision.
In terms of architecture, both processors feature ARMv8.2-A instruction sets and have eight cores. However, the Dimensity 720 consists of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 920 boasts 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 has slightly faster cores, potentially resulting in better overall performance and efficiency.
Another important factor to consider is the lithography, which affects the power consumption and heat generation of the processor. The Dimensity 720 has a 7 nm lithography, whereas the Dimensity 920 has a more advanced 6 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally allows for better power efficiency and lower temperatures, potentially making the Dimensity 920 more desirable in terms of longevity and energy consumption.
Furthermore, both processors have a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watts, which suggests that they are designed to operate within similar power limits. However, it's crucial to note that TDP is not the sole indicator of power consumption, and other factors such as workload and device design can influence actual power usage.
Both the Dimensity 720 and Dimensity 920 feature an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities and supports various AI-related tasks. This can enable efficient performance in tasks such as image processing, voice recognition, and machine learning algorithms.
In conclusion, the Dimensity 920 offers improved processing power and superior lithography compared to the Dimensity 720. These specifications may result in enhanced performance and power efficiency, making the Dimensity 920 a more compelling choice for demanding tasks. However, it's important to consider other factors such as pricing, device compatibility, and user requirements before making a final decision.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 4 |
Shaders | 96 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | MT6877T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
2
Apple A11 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
3
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Helio G95
4
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Samsung Exynos 850
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
6
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Helio P35
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
9
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
10
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Samsung Exynos 7420