MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The MediaTek Dimensity 720 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are both processors designed by MediaTek. While they share some similarities in their specifications, there are also distinct differences between the two.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Dimensity 720 has two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and six power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores running at 2 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 features four Cortex-A76 cores running at a higher clock speed of 2.6 GHz, paired with four Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This means that the Dimensity 820 has a higher overall processing power and may offer better performance in demanding tasks.
Both processors have eight cores in total and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. They also have the same lithography of 7 nm, which is a significant advantage for power efficiency and heat management.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that they offer similar power consumption and heat dissipation capabilities.
Another important feature shared by both processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU enables efficient and powerful AI processing, allowing for enhanced image processing, voice recognition, and other AI-related tasks.
Overall, while the Dimensity 720 and Dimensity 820 processors have several commonalities, the Dimensity 820 offers higher clock speeds and potentially better performance. However, the exact performance difference between the two processors can vary depending on real-life scenarios and the overall system integration in devices that use these processors. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors may depend on specific device requirements and user preferences.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Dimensity 720 has two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.2 GHz and six power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores running at 2 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 820 features four Cortex-A76 cores running at a higher clock speed of 2.6 GHz, paired with four Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This means that the Dimensity 820 has a higher overall processing power and may offer better performance in demanding tasks.
Both processors have eight cores in total and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. They also have the same lithography of 7 nm, which is a significant advantage for power efficiency and heat management.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), both processors have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that they offer similar power consumption and heat dissipation capabilities.
Another important feature shared by both processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU enables efficient and powerful AI processing, allowing for enhanced image processing, voice recognition, and other AI-related tasks.
Overall, while the Dimensity 720 and Dimensity 820 processors have several commonalities, the Dimensity 820 offers higher clock speeds and potentially better performance. However, the exact performance difference between the two processors can vary depending on real-life scenarios and the overall system integration in devices that use these processors. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors may depend on specific device requirements and user preferences.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 5 |
Shaders | 80 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2020 May |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | MT6875 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Helio G25
2
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Helio P95
4
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Apple A13 Bionic
5
Apple A15 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Helio G90
7
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
8
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs MediaTek Helio G80
9
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
10
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480