MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
Both MediaTek Dimensity 720 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are powerful processors but with some key differences in their specifications.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 720, it features 8 CPU cores, including 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. This processor is built on a 7 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts. It also comes with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 also has 8 CPU cores, similar to the Dimensity 720, but with some differences. It has 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at a faster 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. This processor is built on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process and boasts 12,000 million transistors. It also has a lower TDP of 8 watts, making it more power-efficient. Similar to the Dimensity 720, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and includes an NPU for AI processing.
Looking at the specifications of both processors, it is clear that the MediaTek Dimensity 810 offers slightly better performance compared to the Dimensity 720. With faster clock speeds for its Cortex-A76 cores and a more advanced lithography process, it is expected to deliver better overall performance and power efficiency. Additionally, the higher number of transistors in the Dimensity 810 indicates an improvement in its transistor density, which can contribute to improved performance and power efficiency.
However, it is important to note that individual benchmark tests and real-world usage scenarios may also play a role in determining the actual performance difference between these two processors. Other factors such as the rest of the device's hardware and software optimization should also be considered when evaluating their overall performance.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 720, it features 8 CPU cores, including 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. This processor is built on a 7 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 watts. It also comes with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 also has 8 CPU cores, similar to the Dimensity 720, but with some differences. It has 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at a faster 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2 GHz. This processor is built on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process and boasts 12,000 million transistors. It also has a lower TDP of 8 watts, making it more power-efficient. Similar to the Dimensity 720, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and includes an NPU for AI processing.
Looking at the specifications of both processors, it is clear that the MediaTek Dimensity 810 offers slightly better performance compared to the Dimensity 720. With faster clock speeds for its Cortex-A76 cores and a more advanced lithography process, it is expected to deliver better overall performance and power efficiency. Additionally, the higher number of transistors in the Dimensity 810 indicates an improvement in its transistor density, which can contribute to improved performance and power efficiency.
However, it is important to note that individual benchmark tests and real-world usage scenarios may also play a role in determining the actual performance difference between these two processors. Other factors such as the rest of the device's hardware and software optimization should also be considered when evaluating their overall performance.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 8 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@90Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | 2K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6853V/ZA, MT6853V/NZA | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs MediaTek MT6739
2
HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
3
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Google Tensor G3
4
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Unisoc Tiger T620
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek Helio P60
7
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Google Tensor G4
8
Apple A9 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
9
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
10
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Helio G91