HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G with Samsung Exynos 9825. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | 8500 million |
| TDP | 7 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 12 |
| Shaders | 256 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.316 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | S5E9825 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
2
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
5
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Google Tensor G3
6
Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
7
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
8
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800