HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G with Samsung Exynos 9609. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 3 |
| Shaders | 256 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2019 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | S5E9609 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs Google Tensor G5
2
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
3
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Samsung Exynos 2500
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
5
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
6
MediaTek Helio G81 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
8
Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2
9
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Samsung Exynos 9825