HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G with Samsung Exynos 9609. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 9 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 3 |
| Shaders | 256 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2019 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | S5E9609 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
2
Unisoc T820 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
3
Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
5
HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
6
Apple M5 (iPad) vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
7
MediaTek Helio G50 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
8
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Helio P95
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845