HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G with Samsung Exynos 9825. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | 8500 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 12 |
| Shaders | 256 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.316 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | S5E9825 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple M5 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
2
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
4
Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Unisoc Tiger T615
7
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
9
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7060
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs MediaTek Helio G92 Max