HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Samsung Exynos 9825
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G with Samsung Exynos 9825. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | 8500 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 12 |
| Shaders | 256 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.3 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 3840x2400 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.316 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | S5E9825 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
2
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
3
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
5
Apple A18 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
7
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Apple A14 Bionic
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Unisoc Tiger T620
10
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Samsung Exynos 2200