HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Samsung Exynos 9611
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G with Samsung Exynos 9611. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | 3000 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 3 |
| Shaders | 256 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2019 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | S5E9611 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
2
Google Tensor G1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
4
Google Tensor G4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
6
Apple A9 vs Apple A11 Bionic
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Helio G25
8
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Samsung Exynos 1380