HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.20 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Prime) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A77 (Kryo 585 Gold) 4x 1.80 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 585 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 698 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 670 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 2 |
| Shaders | 256 | 512 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 7.5 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 3 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2021 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | SM8250-AC | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
2
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
3
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
5
MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs MediaTek Helio P70
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
7
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
8
Apple A12 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 990
9
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
10
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712