HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tiger T710 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it is built on a 7 nm lithography and houses a total of 8 CPU cores. The architecture includes 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an ARMv8-A instruction set, the Kirin 980 boasts a high performance and efficient processing power. Additionally, it includes HiSilicon Dual NPU for optimal neural processing. With a TDP of 6 Watts and 6900 million transistors, this processor offers a compelling combination of power and energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The processor has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Unlike the Kirin 980, the Tiger T710 is built on a 12 nm lithography, which may result in slightly reduced power efficiency. However, the Tiger T710 does include Dual NPU for neural processing capabilities, providing similar features to the Kirin 980 in that regard.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tiger T710 processors both have 8 cores and support neural processing. However, there are key differences in their specifications. The Kirin 980 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography, while the Tiger T710 uses a 12 nm lithography. Additionally, the Kirin 980 includes a wider range of CPU cores with varying clock speeds, offering a potentially higher level of performance. It is important to consider these specifications when comparing the two processors.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it is built on a 7 nm lithography and houses a total of 8 CPU cores. The architecture includes 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an ARMv8-A instruction set, the Kirin 980 boasts a high performance and efficient processing power. Additionally, it includes HiSilicon Dual NPU for optimal neural processing. With a TDP of 6 Watts and 6900 million transistors, this processor offers a compelling combination of power and energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The processor has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Unlike the Kirin 980, the Tiger T710 is built on a 12 nm lithography, which may result in slightly reduced power efficiency. However, the Tiger T710 does include Dual NPU for neural processing capabilities, providing similar features to the Kirin 980 in that regard.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tiger T710 processors both have 8 cores and support neural processing. However, there are key differences in their specifications. The Kirin 980 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography, while the Tiger T710 uses a 12 nm lithography. Additionally, the Kirin 980 includes a wider range of CPU cores with varying clock speeds, offering a potentially higher level of performance. It is important to consider these specifications when comparing the two processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | |
Shaders | 160 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2019 |
Partnumber | T710 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
2
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs MediaTek Helio G25
3
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
4
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
5
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
7
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Unisoc SC9832E
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
9
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Unisoc SC7731E
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Samsung Exynos 7880