HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tiger T710 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it is built on a 7 nm lithography and houses a total of 8 CPU cores. The architecture includes 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an ARMv8-A instruction set, the Kirin 980 boasts a high performance and efficient processing power. Additionally, it includes HiSilicon Dual NPU for optimal neural processing. With a TDP of 6 Watts and 6900 million transistors, this processor offers a compelling combination of power and energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The processor has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Unlike the Kirin 980, the Tiger T710 is built on a 12 nm lithography, which may result in slightly reduced power efficiency. However, the Tiger T710 does include Dual NPU for neural processing capabilities, providing similar features to the Kirin 980 in that regard.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tiger T710 processors both have 8 cores and support neural processing. However, there are key differences in their specifications. The Kirin 980 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography, while the Tiger T710 uses a 12 nm lithography. Additionally, the Kirin 980 includes a wider range of CPU cores with varying clock speeds, offering a potentially higher level of performance. It is important to consider these specifications when comparing the two processors.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it is built on a 7 nm lithography and houses a total of 8 CPU cores. The architecture includes 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an ARMv8-A instruction set, the Kirin 980 boasts a high performance and efficient processing power. Additionally, it includes HiSilicon Dual NPU for optimal neural processing. With a TDP of 6 Watts and 6900 million transistors, this processor offers a compelling combination of power and energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 features an architecture with 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The processor has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Unlike the Kirin 980, the Tiger T710 is built on a 12 nm lithography, which may result in slightly reduced power efficiency. However, the Tiger T710 does include Dual NPU for neural processing capabilities, providing similar features to the Kirin 980 in that regard.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tiger T710 processors both have 8 cores and support neural processing. However, there are key differences in their specifications. The Kirin 980 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography, while the Tiger T710 uses a 12 nm lithography. Additionally, the Kirin 980 includes a wider range of CPU cores with varying clock speeds, offering a potentially higher level of performance. It is important to consider these specifications when comparing the two processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | |
Shaders | 160 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2019 |
Partnumber | T710 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
4
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs Unisoc Tiger T700
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Helio G95