HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tiger T618 are two processors that offer different specifications and features. Let's explore their differences.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 980 features a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. It consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors come with 8 cores, the Kirin 980 offers a more diverse set of cores with higher clock speeds.
Moving on to the instruction set, the Kirin 980 supports ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T618 supports ARMv8.2-A, which includes some additional features and improvements over the former.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 980 boasts a 7 nm design, which allows for better power efficiency and potentially higher performance compared to the Tiger T618, which has a 12 nm lithography.
The number of transistors is also worth considering. The Kirin 980 houses 6900 million transistors, which generally translates to better performance and efficiency. However, detailed data on the transistor count of the Tiger T618 is not provided.
Additionally, power consumption is an important factor to consider. The Kirin 980 has a TDP of 6 Watts, indicating lower power consumption. In contrast, the Tiger T618 has a TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting slightly higher power usage.
Lastly, both processors feature neural processing units (NPUs) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities. The Kirin 980 comes with the HiSilicon Dual NPU, while the Tiger T618 offers an NPU. The specific capabilities and performance of these NPUs may vary.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tiger T618 processors differ in terms of CPU architecture, instruction set, lithography, power consumption, and NPU capabilities. Depending on the intended usage and priorities, users can make an informed choice based on these specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 980 features a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. It consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors come with 8 cores, the Kirin 980 offers a more diverse set of cores with higher clock speeds.
Moving on to the instruction set, the Kirin 980 supports ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T618 supports ARMv8.2-A, which includes some additional features and improvements over the former.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 980 boasts a 7 nm design, which allows for better power efficiency and potentially higher performance compared to the Tiger T618, which has a 12 nm lithography.
The number of transistors is also worth considering. The Kirin 980 houses 6900 million transistors, which generally translates to better performance and efficiency. However, detailed data on the transistor count of the Tiger T618 is not provided.
Additionally, power consumption is an important factor to consider. The Kirin 980 has a TDP of 6 Watts, indicating lower power consumption. In contrast, the Tiger T618 has a TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting slightly higher power usage.
Lastly, both processors feature neural processing units (NPUs) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities. The Kirin 980 comes with the HiSilicon Dual NPU, while the Tiger T618 offers an NPU. The specific capabilities and performance of these NPUs may vary.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tiger T618 processors differ in terms of CPU architecture, instruction set, lithography, power consumption, and NPU capabilities. Depending on the intended usage and priorities, users can make an informed choice based on these specifications.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | 2 |
Shaders | 160 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | T618 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A11 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Unisoc SC7731E
3
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Helio P65
4
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
5
Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
6
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
9
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
10
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020