HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tiger T310 are both processors with different specifications. Let's compare them:
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 980 is equipped with a more advanced architecture. It has 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T310 has a less impressive architecture with its 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In terms of the number of cores, the Kirin 980 has 8 cores while the Tiger T310 has 4 cores.
Moving on to the instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, the Tiger T310 supports the slightly newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
When it comes to lithography, the Kirin 980 has an advantage with its 7 nm lithography. This allows for better power efficiency and potentially higher performance. In comparison, the Tiger T310 has a 12 nm lithography, which is not as advanced.
In terms of the number of transistors, the Kirin 980 has a higher count with 6900 million transistors. The Tiger T310 does not provide information about its transistor count.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 980 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 watts, which indicates its power efficiency. The Tiger T310 does not provide information about its TDP.
Lastly, the Kirin 980 has a feature called HiSilicon Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances its capability for AI and machine learning tasks. The Tiger T310 does not provide information about its neural processing capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 has a more advanced architecture, higher number of cores, lower lithography, and more transistors compared to the Unisoc Tiger T310. It also provides information about its power consumption and neural processing capabilities, which the Tiger T310 does not. However, it's worth noting that the Tiger T310 supports the slightly newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 980 is equipped with a more advanced architecture. It has 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T310 has a less impressive architecture with its 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. In terms of the number of cores, the Kirin 980 has 8 cores while the Tiger T310 has 4 cores.
Moving on to the instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, the Tiger T310 supports the slightly newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
When it comes to lithography, the Kirin 980 has an advantage with its 7 nm lithography. This allows for better power efficiency and potentially higher performance. In comparison, the Tiger T310 has a 12 nm lithography, which is not as advanced.
In terms of the number of transistors, the Kirin 980 has a higher count with 6900 million transistors. The Tiger T310 does not provide information about its transistor count.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 980 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 watts, which indicates its power efficiency. The Tiger T310 does not provide information about its TDP.
Lastly, the Kirin 980 has a feature called HiSilicon Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances its capability for AI and machine learning tasks. The Tiger T310 does not provide information about its neural processing capabilities.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 has a more advanced architecture, higher number of cores, lower lithography, and more transistors compared to the Unisoc Tiger T310. It also provides information about its power consumption and neural processing capabilities, which the Tiger T310 does not. However, it's worth noting that the Tiger T310 supports the slightly newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | 2 |
Shaders | 160 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2019 April |
Partnumber | T310 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
2
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
4
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Helio G96
6
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Helio G35