HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it features a CPU architecture that consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor boasts a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set. With a smaller lithography of 7 nm and a staggering 6900 million transistors, the Kirin 980 offers high performance with a low TDP of 6 Watts. Additionally, it includes the HiSilicon Dual NPU for enhanced neural processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G is equipped with a CPU architecture consisting of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 980, it also features 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tanggula T770 has a slightly smaller lithography of 6 nm, indicating improved efficiency. With a TDP of 5 Watts, it offers energy-efficient performance. It also includes an NPU for neural processing, albeit without the dual configuration mentioned in the Kirin 980.
In conclusion, while both processors possess 8 cores and operate on the ARM architecture, they differ in terms of clock speeds and lithography. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 boasts higher clock speeds for its individual cores, offering potentially superior performance. It also features a smaller lithography and a larger transistor count, further enhancing its efficiency and power. While the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a smaller lithography and a comparable TDP, its clock speeds are slightly lower than those of the Kirin 980. Additionally, it lacks the dual NPU feature found in the Kirin 980. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on individual needs and priorities, such as performance requirements and power efficiency.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it features a CPU architecture that consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor boasts a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set. With a smaller lithography of 7 nm and a staggering 6900 million transistors, the Kirin 980 offers high performance with a low TDP of 6 Watts. Additionally, it includes the HiSilicon Dual NPU for enhanced neural processing capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G is equipped with a CPU architecture consisting of 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 980, it also features 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tanggula T770 has a slightly smaller lithography of 6 nm, indicating improved efficiency. With a TDP of 5 Watts, it offers energy-efficient performance. It also includes an NPU for neural processing, albeit without the dual configuration mentioned in the Kirin 980.
In conclusion, while both processors possess 8 cores and operate on the ARM architecture, they differ in terms of clock speeds and lithography. The HiSilicon Kirin 980 boasts higher clock speeds for its individual cores, offering potentially superior performance. It also features a smaller lithography and a larger transistor count, further enhancing its efficiency and power. While the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G has a smaller lithography and a comparable TDP, its clock speeds are slightly lower than those of the Kirin 980. Additionally, it lacks the dual NPU feature found in the Kirin 980. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on individual needs and priorities, such as performance requirements and power efficiency.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 32 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | 6 |
Shaders | 160 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2160x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G36 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
2
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
3
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Helio G35
4
Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek Helio G37
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
8
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Helio P60
10
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050