HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc SC9863A are two processors with different specifications and capabilities. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it has an architecture that consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a powerful performance. Additionally, it uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a 7 nm lithography, which indicates higher efficiency and improved power consumption. The processor contains 6900 million transistors and operates at a TDP of 6 Watts. A notable feature is the HiSilicon Dual NPU, providing enhanced neural processing capabilities.
Moving on to the Unisoc SC9863A, it has an architecture consisting of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 980, it also has 8 cores, but with a different distribution. This processor uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a 28 nm lithography. Although it lacks the advanced 7 nm lithography of the Kirin 980, it still provides decent performance. The TDP for this processor is 3 Watts, indicating lower power consumption. The Unisoc SC9863A has an NPU for neural processing tasks, but specific details about its capabilities are not mentioned.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc SC9863A processors have notable differences in their specifications. The Kirin 980 offers a more powerful architecture and advanced lithography, which could result in better performance and efficiency compared to the Unisoc SC9863A. However, the SC9863A stands out with its lower power consumption thanks to its lower wattage TDP. The Kirin 980 also boasts the presence of a HiSilicon Dual NPU, signifying superior neural processing capabilities. On the other hand, specific details about the neural processing capabilities of the SC9863A's NPU are not provided. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific application requirements and priorities such as performance, power consumption, and neural processing needs.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it has an architecture that consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a powerful performance. Additionally, it uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a 7 nm lithography, which indicates higher efficiency and improved power consumption. The processor contains 6900 million transistors and operates at a TDP of 6 Watts. A notable feature is the HiSilicon Dual NPU, providing enhanced neural processing capabilities.
Moving on to the Unisoc SC9863A, it has an architecture consisting of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 980, it also has 8 cores, but with a different distribution. This processor uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a 28 nm lithography. Although it lacks the advanced 7 nm lithography of the Kirin 980, it still provides decent performance. The TDP for this processor is 3 Watts, indicating lower power consumption. The Unisoc SC9863A has an NPU for neural processing tasks, but specific details about its capabilities are not mentioned.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc SC9863A processors have notable differences in their specifications. The Kirin 980 offers a more powerful architecture and advanced lithography, which could result in better performance and efficiency compared to the Unisoc SC9863A. However, the SC9863A stands out with its lower power consumption thanks to its lower wattage TDP. The Kirin 980 also boasts the presence of a HiSilicon Dual NPU, signifying superior neural processing capabilities. On the other hand, specific details about the neural processing capabilities of the SC9863A's NPU are not provided. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific application requirements and priorities such as performance, power consumption, and neural processing needs.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | 4 |
Shaders | 160 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | SC9863A | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G95 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
2
Unisoc SC7731E vs Google Tensor G3
3
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Unisoc Tiger T310
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
7
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs MediaTek Helio G70
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G