HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc SC7731E are two processors that are widely used in smartphones and other electronic devices. These processors, although both capable, have distinct differences in specifications that set them apart.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, this processor boasts a powerful architecture that consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is known for its capability to handle complex tasks efficiently. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and is manufactured on a 7 nm lithography process. This results in improved energy efficiency and overall performance. The Kirin 980 also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) that enhances its capabilities in Artificial Intelligence (AI)-related tasks. With a total of 6900 million transistors, this processor is a powerful option for high-end devices.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E processor offers a different set of specifications. It has an architecture consisting of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. Although it has fewer cores compared to the Kirin 980, it is still capable of handling basic tasks effectively. The SC7731E operates on the ARMv7-A instruction set and is manufactured on a 28 nm lithography process. While it may not offer the same level of energy efficiency and performance as the Kirin 980, it still performs adequately for entry-level devices. Additionally, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watt, indicating its power consumption.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc SC7731E processors have contrasting specifications. The Kirin 980 excels in terms of architecture, with its 8 powerful cores and advanced instruction set. It also has a smaller lithography process, resulting in improved energy efficiency. On the other hand, the SC7731E processor may not have the same capability as the Kirin 980, but it still offers satisfactory performance for entry-level devices. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the intended usage and requirements of the device.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, this processor boasts a powerful architecture that consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is known for its capability to handle complex tasks efficiently. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and is manufactured on a 7 nm lithography process. This results in improved energy efficiency and overall performance. The Kirin 980 also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) that enhances its capabilities in Artificial Intelligence (AI)-related tasks. With a total of 6900 million transistors, this processor is a powerful option for high-end devices.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E processor offers a different set of specifications. It has an architecture consisting of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. Although it has fewer cores compared to the Kirin 980, it is still capable of handling basic tasks effectively. The SC7731E operates on the ARMv7-A instruction set and is manufactured on a 28 nm lithography process. While it may not offer the same level of energy efficiency and performance as the Kirin 980, it still performs adequately for entry-level devices. Additionally, it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watt, indicating its power consumption.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and Unisoc SC7731E processors have contrasting specifications. The Kirin 980 excels in terms of architecture, with its 8 powerful cores and advanced instruction set. It also has a smaller lithography process, resulting in improved energy efficiency. On the other hand, the SC7731E processor may not have the same capability as the Kirin 980, but it still offers satisfactory performance for entry-level devices. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the intended usage and requirements of the device.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | 1 |
Shaders | 160 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
2
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
3
Google Tensor G3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
5
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
8
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
9
Unisoc SC9832E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
10
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 2200