HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are both powerful processors used in smartphones and other electronic devices. When comparing their specifications, several key differences are apparent.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 is equipped with 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 features 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, providing strong performance and multitasking capabilities.
In terms of instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 uses ARMv8-A, while the MediaTek Dimensity 820 uses ARMv8.2-A. While both are advanced instruction sets, the ARMv8.2-A used by the Dimensity 820 may offer slight improvements in performance and efficiency.
Both processors share the same 7 nm lithography, which indicates advanced manufacturing technology that allows for smaller and more power-efficient transistors. Speaking of transistors, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 boasts 6900 million transistors, while this information is not specified for the MediaTek Dimensity 820.
In terms of power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 has a lower thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts, indicating higher energy efficiency. The MediaTek Dimensity 820, on the other hand, has a TDP of 10 Watts, consuming more power.
When it comes to neural processing capabilities, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 includes the HiSilicon Dual NPU, providing advanced artificial intelligence capabilities. The MediaTek Dimensity 820, in contrast, features a general NPU without specifying further details.
In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are powerful processors with their own strengths and capabilities. The Kirin 980 offers a wider variety of CPU cores and a more energy-efficient design, while the Dimensity 820 boasts a slightly newer instruction set. The choice between the two processors may depend on the specific requirements of the device and the user's preferences.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 is equipped with 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 features 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, providing strong performance and multitasking capabilities.
In terms of instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 uses ARMv8-A, while the MediaTek Dimensity 820 uses ARMv8.2-A. While both are advanced instruction sets, the ARMv8.2-A used by the Dimensity 820 may offer slight improvements in performance and efficiency.
Both processors share the same 7 nm lithography, which indicates advanced manufacturing technology that allows for smaller and more power-efficient transistors. Speaking of transistors, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 boasts 6900 million transistors, while this information is not specified for the MediaTek Dimensity 820.
In terms of power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 has a lower thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts, indicating higher energy efficiency. The MediaTek Dimensity 820, on the other hand, has a TDP of 10 Watts, consuming more power.
When it comes to neural processing capabilities, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 includes the HiSilicon Dual NPU, providing advanced artificial intelligence capabilities. The MediaTek Dimensity 820, in contrast, features a general NPU without specifying further details.
In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are powerful processors with their own strengths and capabilities. The Kirin 980 offers a wider variety of CPU cores and a more energy-efficient design, while the Dimensity 820 boasts a slightly newer instruction set. The choice between the two processors may depend on the specific requirements of the device and the user's preferences.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | 5 |
Shaders | 160 | 80 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2020 May |
Partnumber | MT6875 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
3
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Apple A17 Pro
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
5
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Apple A13 Bionic
6
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
7
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
8
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Google Tensor G3
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs MediaTek Helio G35