HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and the MediaTek Dimensity 810 are both processors designed for smartphones and other mobile devices. While they have some similarities in their specifications, they also have some notable differences.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 980 features a configuration of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 810 offers a combination of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, but the Kirin 980 has a higher clock speed on its high-performance cores.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 980 supports ARMv8-A, while the Dimensity 810 supports ARMv8.2-A. This indicates that the Dimensity 810 has a slightly newer version of the instruction set architecture.
The lithography, or the size of the transistors used in the manufacturing process, differs between the two processors. The Kirin 980 is manufactured using a 7 nm process, while the Dimensity 810 utilizes a 6 nm process. A smaller lithography generally translates to a more efficient and powerful processor.
Speaking of transistors, the number of transistors in the Kirin 980 is 6900 million, while the Dimensity 810 boasts 12000 million transistors. This suggests that the Dimensity 810 has a higher transistor count, potentially leading to better performance and power efficiency.
When it comes to power consumption, the Kirin 980 has a TDP (thermal design power) of 6 Watts, while the Dimensity 810 has a TDP of 8 Watts. This means that the Kirin 980 may be more power-efficient, resulting in longer battery life.
Lastly, both processors feature Neural Processing Units (NPU) for AI processing. The Kirin 980 has the HiSilicon Dual NPU, while the Dimensity 810 simply states NPU. It is unclear whether the Dimensity 810 has a single or multi-core NPU.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and the MediaTek Dimensity 810 have distinct differences in their specifications. The Kirin 980 offers higher clock speeds on its high-performance cores and a smaller lithography, while the Dimensity 810 has a higher transistor count. The Kirin 980 also has a lower TDP and a more specified NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 980 features a configuration of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the Dimensity 810 offers a combination of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, but the Kirin 980 has a higher clock speed on its high-performance cores.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 980 supports ARMv8-A, while the Dimensity 810 supports ARMv8.2-A. This indicates that the Dimensity 810 has a slightly newer version of the instruction set architecture.
The lithography, or the size of the transistors used in the manufacturing process, differs between the two processors. The Kirin 980 is manufactured using a 7 nm process, while the Dimensity 810 utilizes a 6 nm process. A smaller lithography generally translates to a more efficient and powerful processor.
Speaking of transistors, the number of transistors in the Kirin 980 is 6900 million, while the Dimensity 810 boasts 12000 million transistors. This suggests that the Dimensity 810 has a higher transistor count, potentially leading to better performance and power efficiency.
When it comes to power consumption, the Kirin 980 has a TDP (thermal design power) of 6 Watts, while the Dimensity 810 has a TDP of 8 Watts. This means that the Kirin 980 may be more power-efficient, resulting in longer battery life.
Lastly, both processors feature Neural Processing Units (NPU) for AI processing. The Kirin 980 has the HiSilicon Dual NPU, while the Dimensity 810 simply states NPU. It is unclear whether the Dimensity 810 has a single or multi-core NPU.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 and the MediaTek Dimensity 810 have distinct differences in their specifications. The Kirin 980 offers higher clock speeds on its high-performance cores and a smaller lithography, while the Dimensity 810 has a higher transistor count. The Kirin 980 also has a lower TDP and a more specified NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | 12000 million |
TDP | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | 2 |
Shaders | 160 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 2K@30FPS |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
2
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
3
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
5
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
6
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Helio P60
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Unisoc SC9863A
9
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Unisoc Tiger T700