HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 980 and the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G are two processors that have distinct specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it utilizes a 7 nm lithography and consists of a total of eight cores. The architecture consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv8-A, this processor boasts a neural processing unit called HiSilicon Dual NPU. It has a TDP (thermal design power) of 6 Watts and contains approximately 6900 million transistors.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features a 5 nm lithography, which allows for more efficient power consumption. Like the Kirin 980, it also has eight cores, consisting of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Its instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, which signifies a slight improvement in terms of architecture. This processor incorporates an impressive neural processing unit called Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, along with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. It shares the same TDP of 6 Watts as the Kirin 980 but has a significantly higher number of transistors, with approximately 15300 million.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G appears to have a more advanced lithography at 5 nm, which may result in greater energy efficiency compared to the Kirin 980's 7 nm. Additionally, the Kirin 9000E 5G features faster clock speeds for its Cortex-A77 cores, which may lead to improved performance in certain tasks. The introduction of the Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny neural processing unit and the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 further enhance the capabilities of the Kirin 9000E 5G. However, despite these improvements, both processors have a similar TDP and the Kirin 980 still maintains a respectable number of transistors. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 980, it utilizes a 7 nm lithography and consists of a total of eight cores. The architecture consists of 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With an instruction set of ARMv8-A, this processor boasts a neural processing unit called HiSilicon Dual NPU. It has a TDP (thermal design power) of 6 Watts and contains approximately 6900 million transistors.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G features a 5 nm lithography, which allows for more efficient power consumption. Like the Kirin 980, it also has eight cores, consisting of 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Its instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, which signifies a slight improvement in terms of architecture. This processor incorporates an impressive neural processing unit called Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, along with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0. It shares the same TDP of 6 Watts as the Kirin 980 but has a significantly higher number of transistors, with approximately 15300 million.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G appears to have a more advanced lithography at 5 nm, which may result in greater energy efficiency compared to the Kirin 980's 7 nm. Additionally, the Kirin 9000E 5G features faster clock speeds for its Cortex-A77 cores, which may lead to improved performance in certain tasks. The introduction of the Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny neural processing unit and the HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 further enhance the capabilities of the Kirin 9000E 5G. However, despite these improvements, both processors have a similar TDP and the Kirin 980 still maintains a respectable number of transistors. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | 6900 million | 15300 million |
TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2750 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G76 MP10 | Mali-G78 MP22 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 720 MHz | 760 MHz |
Execution units | 10 | 22 |
Shaders | 160 | 352 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 3840x2160 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 4 | 2020 October |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Helio G96
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
4
Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
5
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Apple A15 Bionic
6
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
7
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
8
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs MediaTek Helio P65
10
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870