HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
VS
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Unisoc Tiger T612 are both processors designed for mobile devices. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
First, let's look at the CPU cores and architecture. The HiSilicon Kirin 960 has a quad-core Cortex-A73 running at 2.4 GHz and a quad-core Cortex-A53 running at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a dual-core Cortex-A75 running at 1.8 GHz and a hexa-core Cortex-A55 running at 1.8 GHz. Both processors have 8 cores, but the Kirin 960 has a higher clock speed for the higher-performance cores.
Next, let's consider the instruction set. The Kirin 960 uses ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Tiger T612 uses the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that the Tiger T612 supports newer features and can potentially offer better performance in certain tasks.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 960 is built on a 16 nm process, while the Tiger T612 is built on a more advanced 12 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T612 can result in better power efficiency and potentially better overall performance.
Lastly, let's compare the thermal design power (TDP) of the two processors. The Kirin 960 has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Tiger T612 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP indicates better power efficiency, which can lead to longer battery life for mobile devices.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Unisoc Tiger T612 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 960 offers higher clock speeds for its high-performance cores and uses a slightly older instruction set, but it has a smaller lithography and lower TDP. The Tiger T612, on the other hand, has a newer instruction set, a more advanced lithography, but a higher TDP. Overall, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device.
First, let's look at the CPU cores and architecture. The HiSilicon Kirin 960 has a quad-core Cortex-A73 running at 2.4 GHz and a quad-core Cortex-A53 running at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a dual-core Cortex-A75 running at 1.8 GHz and a hexa-core Cortex-A55 running at 1.8 GHz. Both processors have 8 cores, but the Kirin 960 has a higher clock speed for the higher-performance cores.
Next, let's consider the instruction set. The Kirin 960 uses ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Tiger T612 uses the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that the Tiger T612 supports newer features and can potentially offer better performance in certain tasks.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 960 is built on a 16 nm process, while the Tiger T612 is built on a more advanced 12 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T612 can result in better power efficiency and potentially better overall performance.
Lastly, let's compare the thermal design power (TDP) of the two processors. The Kirin 960 has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Tiger T612 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP indicates better power efficiency, which can lead to longer battery life for mobile devices.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Unisoc Tiger T612 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 960 offers higher clock speeds for its high-performance cores and uses a slightly older instruction set, but it has a smaller lithography and lower TDP. The Tiger T612, on the other hand, has a newer instruction set, a more advanced lithography, but a higher TDP. Overall, the choice between the two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 4000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G71 MP8 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 1 |
| Shaders | 128 | 16 |
| DirectX | 11.3 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP | 1x 50MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2016 October | 2022 January |
| Partnumber | Hi3660 | T612 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Unisoc SC7731E
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
4
Apple A18 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
7
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Unisoc Tiger T620
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Google Tensor G1
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710