HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Unisoc Tiger T310 are two processors that are quite different in terms of their specifications and capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 960, it features an architecture that consists of four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of eight cores, this processor can handle multiple tasks efficiently. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm. With a total of 4000 million transistors, it offers a high level of performance. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is rated at 5 Watts, indicating that it operates within a reasonable power range.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has a different architecture. It consists of one Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of four cores, it may not offer the same degree of multitasking capabilities as the Kirin 960. The instruction set used is ARMv8.2-A, which indicates a slightly more advanced version. Additionally, the lithography of the Tiger T310 is 12 nm, which may suggest a more efficient power consumption and potentially better performance.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 offers a higher number of cores and a larger number of transistors, which may indicate better overall performance and multitasking capabilities. However, the Unisoc Tiger T310 utilizes a more advanced instruction set and has a smaller lithography, potentially offering better power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 960, it features an architecture that consists of four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of eight cores, this processor can handle multiple tasks efficiently. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm. With a total of 4000 million transistors, it offers a high level of performance. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is rated at 5 Watts, indicating that it operates within a reasonable power range.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has a different architecture. It consists of one Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of four cores, it may not offer the same degree of multitasking capabilities as the Kirin 960. The instruction set used is ARMv8.2-A, which indicates a slightly more advanced version. Additionally, the lithography of the Tiger T310 is 12 nm, which may suggest a more efficient power consumption and potentially better performance.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 offers a higher number of cores and a larger number of transistors, which may indicate better overall performance and multitasking capabilities. However, the Unisoc Tiger T310 utilizes a more advanced instruction set and has a smaller lithography, potentially offering better power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 4000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G71 MP8 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 2 |
| Shaders | 128 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11.3 | 10 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2016 October | 2019 April |
| Partnumber | Hi3660 | T310 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
3
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs Apple A11 Bionic
6
Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs MediaTek Helio G50
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Unisoc T820
9
Samsung Exynos 7885 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Unisoc SC7731E