HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and Unisoc Tiger T310 are two processors that are quite different in terms of their specifications and capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 960, it features an architecture that consists of four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of eight cores, this processor can handle multiple tasks efficiently. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm. With a total of 4000 million transistors, it offers a high level of performance. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is rated at 5 Watts, indicating that it operates within a reasonable power range.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has a different architecture. It consists of one Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of four cores, it may not offer the same degree of multitasking capabilities as the Kirin 960. The instruction set used is ARMv8.2-A, which indicates a slightly more advanced version. Additionally, the lithography of the Tiger T310 is 12 nm, which may suggest a more efficient power consumption and potentially better performance.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 offers a higher number of cores and a larger number of transistors, which may indicate better overall performance and multitasking capabilities. However, the Unisoc Tiger T310 utilizes a more advanced instruction set and has a smaller lithography, potentially offering better power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 960, it features an architecture that consists of four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of eight cores, this processor can handle multiple tasks efficiently. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm. With a total of 4000 million transistors, it offers a high level of performance. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) is rated at 5 Watts, indicating that it operates within a reasonable power range.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has a different architecture. It consists of one Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With a total of four cores, it may not offer the same degree of multitasking capabilities as the Kirin 960. The instruction set used is ARMv8.2-A, which indicates a slightly more advanced version. Additionally, the lithography of the Tiger T310 is 12 nm, which may suggest a more efficient power consumption and potentially better performance.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 offers a higher number of cores and a larger number of transistors, which may indicate better overall performance and multitasking capabilities. However, the Unisoc Tiger T310 utilizes a more advanced instruction set and has a smaller lithography, potentially offering better power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 4000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G71 MP8 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 2 |
Shaders | 128 | 32 |
DirectX | 11.3 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 October | 2019 April |
Partnumber | Hi3660 | T310 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
3
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9010
4
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Helio G80
5
MediaTek Helio G88 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
6
Samsung Exynos 1480 vs Google Tensor G4
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus vs MediaTek Helio A25
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs MediaTek Helio G91
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
10
MediaTek Helio G36 vs MediaTek MT6737