HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the Unisoc SC9832E are two processors with different specifications. The Kirin 960 is built on a 16 nm lithography process, while the SC9832E uses a 28 nm process. This difference in lithography means that the Kirin 960 has a higher transistor count of 4000 million compared to the SC9832E. This higher transistor count allows for more complex operations and better performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 960 is equipped with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the SC9832E has 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Kirin 960 offers a more powerful and diverse CPU core setup with a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. This allows for better multitasking, faster processing, and improved power efficiency.
Both processors use the ARMv8-A instruction set, which is a modern instruction set that provides improved performance and energy efficiency. However, the Kirin 960 has an advantage in terms of its CPU architecture and clock speeds, which results in better overall performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 960 has a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watt compared to the 7 Watt TDP of the SC9832E. This means that the Kirin 960 is more power-efficient and generates less heat during operation.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of specifications. With its higher transistor count, more powerful CPU cores, and lower power consumption, the Kirin 960 offers better performance and efficiency. However, it is important to consider other factors such as software optimization, device integration, and real-world usage scenarios when comparing processors.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 960 is equipped with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the SC9832E has 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Kirin 960 offers a more powerful and diverse CPU core setup with a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. This allows for better multitasking, faster processing, and improved power efficiency.
Both processors use the ARMv8-A instruction set, which is a modern instruction set that provides improved performance and energy efficiency. However, the Kirin 960 has an advantage in terms of its CPU architecture and clock speeds, which results in better overall performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 960 has a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watt compared to the 7 Watt TDP of the SC9832E. This means that the Kirin 960 is more power-efficient and generates less heat during operation.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of specifications. With its higher transistor count, more powerful CPU cores, and lower power consumption, the Kirin 960 offers better performance and efficiency. However, it is important to consider other factors such as software optimization, device integration, and real-world usage scenarios when comparing processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Number of transistors | 4000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 2 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G71 MP8 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 1 |
| Shaders | 128 | 4 |
| DirectX | 11.3 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP | 1x 13MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2016 October | 2018 |
| Partnumber | Hi3660 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
3
MediaTek Helio P22 vs Samsung Exynos 7885
4
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
5
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Apple M5 (iPad)
6
MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
7
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Samsung Exynos 1580
10
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Helio P90