HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the Unisoc SC9832E are two processors with different specifications. The Kirin 960 is built on a 16 nm lithography process, while the SC9832E uses a 28 nm process. This difference in lithography means that the Kirin 960 has a higher transistor count of 4000 million compared to the SC9832E. This higher transistor count allows for more complex operations and better performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 960 is equipped with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the SC9832E has 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Kirin 960 offers a more powerful and diverse CPU core setup with a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. This allows for better multitasking, faster processing, and improved power efficiency.
Both processors use the ARMv8-A instruction set, which is a modern instruction set that provides improved performance and energy efficiency. However, the Kirin 960 has an advantage in terms of its CPU architecture and clock speeds, which results in better overall performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 960 has a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watt compared to the 7 Watt TDP of the SC9832E. This means that the Kirin 960 is more power-efficient and generates less heat during operation.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of specifications. With its higher transistor count, more powerful CPU cores, and lower power consumption, the Kirin 960 offers better performance and efficiency. However, it is important to consider other factors such as software optimization, device integration, and real-world usage scenarios when comparing processors.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 960 is equipped with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the SC9832E has 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Kirin 960 offers a more powerful and diverse CPU core setup with a combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. This allows for better multitasking, faster processing, and improved power efficiency.
Both processors use the ARMv8-A instruction set, which is a modern instruction set that provides improved performance and energy efficiency. However, the Kirin 960 has an advantage in terms of its CPU architecture and clock speeds, which results in better overall performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 960 has a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watt compared to the 7 Watt TDP of the SC9832E. This means that the Kirin 960 is more power-efficient and generates less heat during operation.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 outperforms the Unisoc SC9832E in terms of specifications. With its higher transistor count, more powerful CPU cores, and lower power consumption, the Kirin 960 offers better performance and efficiency. However, it is important to consider other factors such as software optimization, device integration, and real-world usage scenarios when comparing processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 4000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 2 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 667 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G71 MP8 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Midgard |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 1 |
Shaders | 128 | 4 |
DirectX | 11.3 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP | 1x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 October | 2018 |
Partnumber | Hi3660 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Google Tensor G3
2
MediaTek Dimensity 7350 vs MediaTek Helio P35
3
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple M1 (iPad)
4
MediaTek Helio G25 vs Google Tensor G1
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
6
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
7
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
10
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430