HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Unisoc SC7731E
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the Unisoc SC7731E are two distinct processors with varying specifications. Let's compare these processors based on their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 offers a more advanced architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E features 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores, which are less powerful compared to the Kirin 960.
The number of cores also differs between these processors. The Kirin 960 boasts an impressive 8 cores, whereas the SC7731E has 4 cores. More cores generally indicate better multitasking capabilities and improved performance.
In terms of instruction set, the Kirin 960 utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, which is a more advanced instruction set compared to the ARMv7-A instruction set used by the SC7731E. The ARMv8-A architecture offers better performance and efficiency.
The lithography of the processors is another factor to consider. The Kirin 960 has a lithography of 16 nm, which is a smaller and more efficient node compared to the 28 nm lithography of the SC7731E. Smaller lithography enables better power efficiency and improved performance.
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor indicates its maximum power consumption and heat generation. The Kirin 960 has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the SC7731E has a slightly higher TDP of 7 Watts. A lower TDP generally implies better power efficiency.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of CPU architecture, the number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and TDP. The Kirin 960 offers a more powerful and efficient processing capability compared to the SC7731E, making it a superior choice for tasks that require advanced performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 offers a more advanced architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E features 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores, which are less powerful compared to the Kirin 960.
The number of cores also differs between these processors. The Kirin 960 boasts an impressive 8 cores, whereas the SC7731E has 4 cores. More cores generally indicate better multitasking capabilities and improved performance.
In terms of instruction set, the Kirin 960 utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, which is a more advanced instruction set compared to the ARMv7-A instruction set used by the SC7731E. The ARMv8-A architecture offers better performance and efficiency.
The lithography of the processors is another factor to consider. The Kirin 960 has a lithography of 16 nm, which is a smaller and more efficient node compared to the 28 nm lithography of the SC7731E. Smaller lithography enables better power efficiency and improved performance.
The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor indicates its maximum power consumption and heat generation. The Kirin 960 has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the SC7731E has a slightly higher TDP of 7 Watts. A lower TDP generally implies better power efficiency.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of CPU architecture, the number of cores, instruction set, lithography, and TDP. The Kirin 960 offers a more powerful and efficient processing capability compared to the SC7731E, making it a superior choice for tasks that require advanced performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 4000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G71 MP8 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 1 |
Shaders | 128 | 4 |
DirectX | 11.3 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 October | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3660 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
2
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Helio P70
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
10
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Helio G25