HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are both processors commonly found in smartphones. While they have similarities in terms of the number of cores and overall architecture, there are notable differences in their specifications that set them apart.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 960, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination allows for a balance between high-performance tasks and power efficiency. The processor utilizes ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm. With 4000 million transistors, the Kirin 960 offers a decent level of complexity and capability. It operates with a TDP of 5 Watt, making it energy efficient.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts an architecture consisting of 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination places a greater emphasis on high-performance tasks with its powerful Cortex-A78 cores. It also operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and offers a more advanced lithography of 6 nm. Additionally, the Dimensity 920 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities. However, this processor has a higher TDP of 10 Watt, indicating a slightly higher power consumption compared to the Kirin 960.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 cater to different priorities. The Kirin 960 focuses on a balance between performance and power efficiency with its combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores. In contrast, the Dimensity 920 prioritizes high performance with its Cortex-A78 cores while incorporating an NPU for improved AI capabilities. Depending on the specific needs and preferences of users, either processor can provide a suitable experience.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 960, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination allows for a balance between high-performance tasks and power efficiency. The processor utilizes ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 16 nm. With 4000 million transistors, the Kirin 960 offers a decent level of complexity and capability. It operates with a TDP of 5 Watt, making it energy efficient.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts an architecture consisting of 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination places a greater emphasis on high-performance tasks with its powerful Cortex-A78 cores. It also operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and offers a more advanced lithography of 6 nm. Additionally, the Dimensity 920 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities. However, this processor has a higher TDP of 10 Watt, indicating a slightly higher power consumption compared to the Kirin 960.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 cater to different priorities. The Kirin 960 focuses on a balance between performance and power efficiency with its combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores. In contrast, the Dimensity 920 prioritizes high performance with its Cortex-A78 cores while incorporating an NPU for improved AI capabilities. Depending on the specific needs and preferences of users, either processor can provide a suitable experience.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 4000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G71 MP8 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 8 | 4 |
| Shaders | 128 | 96 |
| DirectX | 11.3 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2016 October | 2021 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi3660 | MT6877T |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 vs Apple M3 (iPad)
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
5
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Helio P22
6
MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
7
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
8
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
9
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Google Tensor G1
10
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430