HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 are two processors with different specifications that cater to different needs.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 960, it features 8 CPU cores with an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. With a 16 nm lithography and 4000 million transistors, this processor offers efficient performance while consuming only 5 Watts of power. It supports the ARMv8-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has 4 CPU cores with an architecture of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This processor operates on a 7 nm lithography and consumes 10 Watts of power. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and also boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enhancing its capabilities in tasks related to artificial intelligence.
When it comes to performance, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 with its 8 cores offers a higher potential for multitasking and processing demanding applications. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 with its more advanced architecture and 7 nm lithography might deliver better efficiency and power management.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8 architecture variant, indicating compatibility with modern software and algorithms. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 supports the newer ARMv8.2-A, which may offer certain advantages in optimized code execution.
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 differ in their lithography, with the Kirin 960 using 16 nm technology and the Dimensity 800 incorporating more advanced 7 nm technology. Generally, a lower lithography translates to better power efficiency and lower heat generation.
Additionally, it is important to note that while the HiSilicon Kirin 960 boasts more CPU cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 takes advantage of an NPU, which can significantly accelerate AI-related tasks, such as facial recognition, image processing, and voice recognition.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors have unique specifications and cater to different needs. The Kirin 960 excels in multitasking and offers efficient performance, while the Dimensity 800 prioritizes power efficiency and includes an NPU for enhanced AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 960, it features 8 CPU cores with an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. With a 16 nm lithography and 4000 million transistors, this processor offers efficient performance while consuming only 5 Watts of power. It supports the ARMv8-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 has 4 CPU cores with an architecture of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This processor operates on a 7 nm lithography and consumes 10 Watts of power. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and also boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enhancing its capabilities in tasks related to artificial intelligence.
When it comes to performance, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 with its 8 cores offers a higher potential for multitasking and processing demanding applications. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 with its more advanced architecture and 7 nm lithography might deliver better efficiency and power management.
In terms of instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8 architecture variant, indicating compatibility with modern software and algorithms. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 supports the newer ARMv8.2-A, which may offer certain advantages in optimized code execution.
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 differ in their lithography, with the Kirin 960 using 16 nm technology and the Dimensity 800 incorporating more advanced 7 nm technology. Generally, a lower lithography translates to better power efficiency and lower heat generation.
Additionally, it is important to note that while the HiSilicon Kirin 960 boasts more CPU cores, the MediaTek Dimensity 800 takes advantage of an NPU, which can significantly accelerate AI-related tasks, such as facial recognition, image processing, and voice recognition.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the MediaTek Dimensity 800 processors have unique specifications and cater to different needs. The Kirin 960 excels in multitasking and offers efficient performance, while the Dimensity 800 prioritizes power efficiency and includes an NPU for enhanced AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 4000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G71 MP8 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 4 |
Shaders | 128 | 64 |
DirectX | 11.3 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 October | 2020 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi3660 | MT6873, MT6873V |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Apple A11 Bionic
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Apple A10X Fusion
7
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs MediaTek Helio G90T
9
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
10
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955