HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 and HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them:
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 960, it features a CPU architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. It has a total of 8 cores, supporting the ARMv8-A instruction set. The processor is manufactured using a 16 nm lithography process, meaning it is relatively older technology. It consists of 4,000 million transistors and has a power consumption of 5 watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G boasts an enhanced architecture. It incorporates 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It also has 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Unlike the Kirin 960, this processor is manufactured using a more advanced 5 nm lithography process. It contains a higher number of transistors, with 15,300 million, indicating improved performance. The power consumption for the Kirin 9000E 5G is slightly higher at 6 watts. Additionally, it offers neural processing capabilities through its Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G surpasses the Kirin 960 in terms of architecture, lithography, transistor count, and neural processing capabilities. With a more powerful and efficient CPU architecture and advanced manufacturing technology, the Kirin 9000E 5G is expected to provide better performance, higher energy efficiency, and enhanced AI capabilities compared to the Kirin 960.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 960, it features a CPU architecture with 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. It has a total of 8 cores, supporting the ARMv8-A instruction set. The processor is manufactured using a 16 nm lithography process, meaning it is relatively older technology. It consists of 4,000 million transistors and has a power consumption of 5 watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G boasts an enhanced architecture. It incorporates 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It also has 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Unlike the Kirin 960, this processor is manufactured using a more advanced 5 nm lithography process. It contains a higher number of transistors, with 15,300 million, indicating improved performance. The power consumption for the Kirin 9000E 5G is slightly higher at 6 watts. Additionally, it offers neural processing capabilities through its Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G surpasses the Kirin 960 in terms of architecture, lithography, transistor count, and neural processing capabilities. With a more powerful and efficient CPU architecture and advanced manufacturing technology, the Kirin 9000E 5G is expected to provide better performance, higher energy efficiency, and enhanced AI capabilities compared to the Kirin 960.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | 4000 million | 15300 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2750 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G71 MP8 | Mali-G78 MP22 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 760 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 22 |
Shaders | 128 | 352 |
DirectX | 11.3 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 October | 2020 October |
Partnumber | Hi3660 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
4
Apple A12 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
5
MediaTek Helio A25 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs MediaTek Helio G88
7
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U