HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T710 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare the two based on their specifications.
First, let's look at the CPU cores and architecture. The Kirin 955 features 4 Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Tiger T710 has 4 Cortex-A75 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores. Based on this, we can see that the Kirin 955 has a slightly higher clock speed for its high-performance cores.
Moving on, both processors have 8 cores and belong to the ARMv8 architecture. However, the Tiger T710 supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is a more advanced version compared to the ARMv8-A supported by the Kirin 955. This indicates that the Tiger T710 may have some additional features and optimizations.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 955 utilizes a 16 nm process, while the Tiger T710 makes use of a 12 nm process. Generally, a smaller lithography allows for a more power-efficient and potentially faster processor.
When it comes to the number of transistors, the Kirin 955 packs in 2000 million transistors, but there is no information available for the Tiger T710's transistor count. While the Kirin 955 may have a relatively higher transistor count, it doesn't necessarily indicate superior performance.
Lastly, the Kirin 955 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, but no information is provided about the Tiger T710's TDP. A lower TDP generally signifies better power efficiency.
Additionally, it is worth mentioning that the Tiger T710 boasts a Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), highlighting its capability for AI-related tasks and applications.
In conclusion, the Kirin 955 and Tiger T710 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 955 offers a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, while the Tiger T710 supports a more advanced instruction set. The Tiger T710 also takes advantage of a smaller lithography and incorporates a Dual NPU for enhanced AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.
First, let's look at the CPU cores and architecture. The Kirin 955 features 4 Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Tiger T710 has 4 Cortex-A75 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores. Based on this, we can see that the Kirin 955 has a slightly higher clock speed for its high-performance cores.
Moving on, both processors have 8 cores and belong to the ARMv8 architecture. However, the Tiger T710 supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which is a more advanced version compared to the ARMv8-A supported by the Kirin 955. This indicates that the Tiger T710 may have some additional features and optimizations.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 955 utilizes a 16 nm process, while the Tiger T710 makes use of a 12 nm process. Generally, a smaller lithography allows for a more power-efficient and potentially faster processor.
When it comes to the number of transistors, the Kirin 955 packs in 2000 million transistors, but there is no information available for the Tiger T710's transistor count. While the Kirin 955 may have a relatively higher transistor count, it doesn't necessarily indicate superior performance.
Lastly, the Kirin 955 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, but no information is provided about the Tiger T710's TDP. A lower TDP generally signifies better power efficiency.
Additionally, it is worth mentioning that the Tiger T710 boasts a Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), highlighting its capability for AI-related tasks and applications.
In conclusion, the Kirin 955 and Tiger T710 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 955 offers a higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, while the Tiger T710 supports a more advanced instruction set. The Tiger T710 also takes advantage of a smaller lithography and incorporates a Dual NPU for enhanced AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 11.2 | |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2019 |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
3
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio G70
7
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Apple A14 Bionic
8
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
9
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Helio G36
10
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Apple A15 Bionic