HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T700 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them based on their key features.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a more powerful setup, featuring 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 consists of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. In terms of sheer processing power, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 takes the lead.
Moving on to instruction set, both processors support ARM architecture. The Kirin 955 follows the ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Tiger T700 features the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Although the Unisoc Tiger T700 utilizes the more advanced instruction set, it is worth noting that the Kirin 955's ARMv8-A still offers excellent performance.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T700 shines with a smaller 12 nm lithography, compared to the Kirin 955's 16 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally leads to improved power efficiency and better heat management.
Regarding power consumption, the Kirin 955 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 watts, while the Tiger T700's TDP is slightly higher at 10 watts. This indicates that the Kirin 955 is designed to consume less energy and generate less heat during operation.
Under the hood, the Kirin 955 packs 2000 million transistors, showcasing its impressive complexity. While there is no information provided about the Tiger T700's transistor count, it is safe to assume it will be lower due to the processor's smaller lithography.
In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T700 possess their unique advantages. The Kirin 955 stands out with its powerful CPU cores and lower power consumption, while the Tiger T700 impresses with its smaller lithography. Selecting the ideal processor ultimately depends on the specific needs and priorities of the user, such as processing power, energy efficiency, and budget.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a more powerful setup, featuring 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 consists of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. In terms of sheer processing power, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 takes the lead.
Moving on to instruction set, both processors support ARM architecture. The Kirin 955 follows the ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Tiger T700 features the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Although the Unisoc Tiger T700 utilizes the more advanced instruction set, it is worth noting that the Kirin 955's ARMv8-A still offers excellent performance.
In terms of lithography, the Unisoc Tiger T700 shines with a smaller 12 nm lithography, compared to the Kirin 955's 16 nm lithography. A smaller lithography generally leads to improved power efficiency and better heat management.
Regarding power consumption, the Kirin 955 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 watts, while the Tiger T700's TDP is slightly higher at 10 watts. This indicates that the Kirin 955 is designed to consume less energy and generate less heat during operation.
Under the hood, the Kirin 955 packs 2000 million transistors, showcasing its impressive complexity. While there is no information provided about the Tiger T700's transistor count, it is safe to assume it will be lower due to the processor's smaller lithography.
In conclusion, both the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T700 possess their unique advantages. The Kirin 955 stands out with its powerful CPU cores and lower power consumption, while the Tiger T700 impresses with its smaller lithography. Selecting the ideal processor ultimately depends on the specific needs and priorities of the user, such as processing power, energy efficiency, and budget.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2021 March |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
2
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek MT6737
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs MediaTek Helio P60
4
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500
7
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
8
Unisoc T8300 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
10
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400e