HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and Unisoc Tiger T612 are two processors with varying specifications. In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a configuration of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 consists of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have a total of 8 cores, providing ample processing power for various tasks.
In terms of instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 employs the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This indicates that the Unisoc Tiger T612 may have access to more advanced instructions and features, potentially resulting in improved performance and efficiency.
When it comes to lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 utilizes a 16 nm process, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 employs a more advanced 12 nm process. A smaller lithography generally allows for better power efficiency and performance.
In terms of power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, whereas the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the HiSilicon Kirin 955 may provide better power efficiency, leading to longer battery life in devices that incorporate this processor.
Overall, both the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and Unisoc Tiger T612 offer unique specifications that cater to different needs. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 boasts a higher clock speed with its Cortex-A72 cores and potentially better power efficiency with its 16 nm lithography. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 features a more advanced instruction set and a smaller lithography, potentially resulting in improved performance and power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements of the intended application or device.
In terms of instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 employs the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This indicates that the Unisoc Tiger T612 may have access to more advanced instructions and features, potentially resulting in improved performance and efficiency.
When it comes to lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 utilizes a 16 nm process, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 employs a more advanced 12 nm process. A smaller lithography generally allows for better power efficiency and performance.
In terms of power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, whereas the Unisoc Tiger T612 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This suggests that the HiSilicon Kirin 955 may provide better power efficiency, leading to longer battery life in devices that incorporate this processor.
Overall, both the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and Unisoc Tiger T612 offer unique specifications that cater to different needs. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 boasts a higher clock speed with its Cortex-A72 cores and potentially better power efficiency with its 16 nm lithography. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 features a more advanced instruction set and a smaller lithography, potentially resulting in improved performance and power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements of the intended application or device.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2022 January |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
2
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
5
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
8
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
10
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Helio G35