HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
When comparing the specifications of the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T610 processors, there are several notable differences to consider.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 boasts a more powerful setup with 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination provides a balance between high-performance tasks and power efficiency. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 processor features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This arrangement may not have the same level of raw power as the Kirin 955 but still provides a good overall performance.
When it comes to the instruction set, the processors differ as well. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, whereas the Unisoc Tiger T610 employs the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that the Tiger T610 may offer improved processing capabilities and performance in certain scenarios.
Another distinguishing factor is the lithography, with the Kirin 955 manufactured using a 16 nm process while the Tiger T610 using a 12 nm process. A smaller lithography generally results in a more power-efficient and faster processor. Therefore, the Tiger T610 has the potential to be more power-efficient compared to the Kirin 955.
Lastly, the thermal design power (TDP) should be taken into account. The Kirin 955 has a TDP of 5 Watts, which suggests it is designed to operate with lower power consumption. Meanwhile, the Tiger T610 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that it may consume more power.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and Unisoc Tiger T610 processors have their respective strengths. The Kirin 955 has a more powerful CPU setup and may offer better power efficiency. On the other hand, the Tiger T610 features a more advanced instruction set and a potentially more power-efficient manufacturing process. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or application.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 boasts a more powerful setup with 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination provides a balance between high-performance tasks and power efficiency. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 processor features 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This arrangement may not have the same level of raw power as the Kirin 955 but still provides a good overall performance.
When it comes to the instruction set, the processors differ as well. The HiSilicon Kirin 955 utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, whereas the Unisoc Tiger T610 employs the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that the Tiger T610 may offer improved processing capabilities and performance in certain scenarios.
Another distinguishing factor is the lithography, with the Kirin 955 manufactured using a 16 nm process while the Tiger T610 using a 12 nm process. A smaller lithography generally results in a more power-efficient and faster processor. Therefore, the Tiger T610 has the potential to be more power-efficient compared to the Kirin 955.
Lastly, the thermal design power (TDP) should be taken into account. The Kirin 955 has a TDP of 5 Watts, which suggests it is designed to operate with lower power consumption. Meanwhile, the Tiger T610 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that it may consume more power.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and Unisoc Tiger T610 processors have their respective strengths. The Kirin 955 has a more powerful CPU setup and may offer better power efficiency. On the other hand, the Tiger T610 features a more advanced instruction set and a potentially more power-efficient manufacturing process. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or application.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2019 June |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
3
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
4
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Apple A16 Bionic
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
6
Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
7
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
8
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Helio G35
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
10
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 8895