HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc Tiger T606 are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 is an octa-core processor with a clock speed of 2.5 GHz for its Cortex-A72 cores and 1.8 GHz for its Cortex-A53 cores. It is built on a 16 nm lithography process and has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 watts. The processor uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a total of 8 cores. With a total of 2000 million transistors, it offers a high level of performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 is also an octa-core processor, but it uses a different architecture. It has two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.6 GHz. The T606 is manufactured using a 12 nm lithography process and has a higher TDP of 10 watts. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and also has a total of 8 cores. While it may have a lower transistor count compared to the Kirin 955, it still offers competitive performance.
In terms of architecture, the Kirin 955 combines high-performance Cortex-A72 cores with power-efficient Cortex-A53 cores. This allows for a balance between performance and power consumption. On the other hand, the T606 uses a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A75 cores provide higher performance, while the Cortex-A55 cores offer improved efficiency.
In terms of lithography, the T606 has a slight advantage with its 12 nm process compared to the 16 nm process of the Kirin 955. A smaller lithography process generally results in improved power efficiency and better overall performance.
Overall, both processors offer competitive specifications and performance. The Kirin 955 is known for its balance between performance and power consumption, while the T606 features higher-performance Cortex-A75 cores. Depending on the specific use case and requirements, one may be preferred over the other.
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 is an octa-core processor with a clock speed of 2.5 GHz for its Cortex-A72 cores and 1.8 GHz for its Cortex-A53 cores. It is built on a 16 nm lithography process and has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 watts. The processor uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a total of 8 cores. With a total of 2000 million transistors, it offers a high level of performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 is also an octa-core processor, but it uses a different architecture. It has two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also running at 1.6 GHz. The T606 is manufactured using a 12 nm lithography process and has a higher TDP of 10 watts. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and also has a total of 8 cores. While it may have a lower transistor count compared to the Kirin 955, it still offers competitive performance.
In terms of architecture, the Kirin 955 combines high-performance Cortex-A72 cores with power-efficient Cortex-A53 cores. This allows for a balance between performance and power consumption. On the other hand, the T606 uses a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A75 cores provide higher performance, while the Cortex-A55 cores offer improved efficiency.
In terms of lithography, the T606 has a slight advantage with its 12 nm process compared to the 16 nm process of the Kirin 955. A smaller lithography process generally results in improved power efficiency and better overall performance.
Overall, both processors offer competitive specifications and performance. The Kirin 955 is known for its balance between performance and power consumption, while the T606 features higher-performance Cortex-A75 cores. Depending on the specific use case and requirements, one may be preferred over the other.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x900@90Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2021 October |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Helio P90
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Apple A17 Pro
3
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
7
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
8
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
9
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
10
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020