HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc SC9863A are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it boasts a powerful architecture with 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This setup allows for efficient multitasking and seamless performance. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. With a lithography size of 16 nm, this processor is able to accommodate around 2000 million transistors, resulting in impressive processing capabilities. Additionally, it operates with a maximum TDP of 5 Watts, making it energy-efficient.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A features a slightly different architecture. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While this configuration may not be as powerful as the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it still provides a decent level of performance. The processor is equipped with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with modern software. With a lithography size of 28 nm, it is not as efficient as the Kirin 955 in terms of power consumption. However, it has a lower maximum TDP of 3 Watts, which contributes to improved energy efficiency. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc SC9863A have different specifications that cater to specific needs. The Kirin 955 excels in terms of power and efficiency, with its powerful Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Unisoc SC9863A offers a more energy-efficient option with its Cortex-A55 cores and NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the intended usage and priorities of the device in question.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it boasts a powerful architecture with 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This setup allows for efficient multitasking and seamless performance. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. With a lithography size of 16 nm, this processor is able to accommodate around 2000 million transistors, resulting in impressive processing capabilities. Additionally, it operates with a maximum TDP of 5 Watts, making it energy-efficient.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A features a slightly different architecture. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While this configuration may not be as powerful as the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it still provides a decent level of performance. The processor is equipped with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with modern software. With a lithography size of 28 nm, it is not as efficient as the Kirin 955 in terms of power consumption. However, it has a lower maximum TDP of 3 Watts, which contributes to improved energy efficiency. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc SC9863A have different specifications that cater to specific needs. The Kirin 955 excels in terms of power and efficiency, with its powerful Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Unisoc SC9863A offers a more energy-efficient option with its Cortex-A55 cores and NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the intended usage and priorities of the device in question.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2018 November |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
3
Apple A14 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
4
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Apple A13 Bionic
5
Apple A17 Pro vs MediaTek Helio G35
6
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Apple A12 Bionic
8
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Helio P60
9
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
10
MediaTek Helio P90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020