HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc SC9863A are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it boasts a powerful architecture with 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This setup allows for efficient multitasking and seamless performance. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. With a lithography size of 16 nm, this processor is able to accommodate around 2000 million transistors, resulting in impressive processing capabilities. Additionally, it operates with a maximum TDP of 5 Watts, making it energy-efficient.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A features a slightly different architecture. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While this configuration may not be as powerful as the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it still provides a decent level of performance. The processor is equipped with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with modern software. With a lithography size of 28 nm, it is not as efficient as the Kirin 955 in terms of power consumption. However, it has a lower maximum TDP of 3 Watts, which contributes to improved energy efficiency. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc SC9863A have different specifications that cater to specific needs. The Kirin 955 excels in terms of power and efficiency, with its powerful Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Unisoc SC9863A offers a more energy-efficient option with its Cortex-A55 cores and NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the intended usage and priorities of the device in question.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it boasts a powerful architecture with 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This setup allows for efficient multitasking and seamless performance. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. With a lithography size of 16 nm, this processor is able to accommodate around 2000 million transistors, resulting in impressive processing capabilities. Additionally, it operates with a maximum TDP of 5 Watts, making it energy-efficient.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A features a slightly different architecture. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While this configuration may not be as powerful as the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it still provides a decent level of performance. The processor is equipped with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with modern software. With a lithography size of 28 nm, it is not as efficient as the Kirin 955 in terms of power consumption. However, it has a lower maximum TDP of 3 Watts, which contributes to improved energy efficiency. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc SC9863A have different specifications that cater to specific needs. The Kirin 955 excels in terms of power and efficiency, with its powerful Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Unisoc SC9863A offers a more energy-efficient option with its Cortex-A55 cores and NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the intended usage and priorities of the device in question.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2018 November |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Google Tensor G3
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Apple A15 Bionic
3
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Helio G25
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
5
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
6
MediaTek Helio G70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
7
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
9
Apple A17 Pro vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000