HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc SC9863A are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it boasts a powerful architecture with 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This setup allows for efficient multitasking and seamless performance. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. With a lithography size of 16 nm, this processor is able to accommodate around 2000 million transistors, resulting in impressive processing capabilities. Additionally, it operates with a maximum TDP of 5 Watts, making it energy-efficient.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A features a slightly different architecture. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While this configuration may not be as powerful as the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it still provides a decent level of performance. The processor is equipped with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with modern software. With a lithography size of 28 nm, it is not as efficient as the Kirin 955 in terms of power consumption. However, it has a lower maximum TDP of 3 Watts, which contributes to improved energy efficiency. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc SC9863A have different specifications that cater to specific needs. The Kirin 955 excels in terms of power and efficiency, with its powerful Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Unisoc SC9863A offers a more energy-efficient option with its Cortex-A55 cores and NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the intended usage and priorities of the device in question.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it boasts a powerful architecture with 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This setup allows for efficient multitasking and seamless performance. It utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. With a lithography size of 16 nm, this processor is able to accommodate around 2000 million transistors, resulting in impressive processing capabilities. Additionally, it operates with a maximum TDP of 5 Watts, making it energy-efficient.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A features a slightly different architecture. It consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While this configuration may not be as powerful as the HiSilicon Kirin 955, it still provides a decent level of performance. The processor is equipped with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which ensures compatibility with modern software. With a lithography size of 28 nm, it is not as efficient as the Kirin 955 in terms of power consumption. However, it has a lower maximum TDP of 3 Watts, which contributes to improved energy efficiency. Additionally, the Unisoc SC9863A stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its ability to handle AI-related tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 955 and the Unisoc SC9863A have different specifications that cater to specific needs. The Kirin 955 excels in terms of power and efficiency, with its powerful Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Unisoc SC9863A offers a more energy-efficient option with its Cortex-A55 cores and NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the intended usage and priorities of the device in question.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 3 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 4 |
| Shaders | 64 | 128 |
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2016 April | 2018 November |
| Partnumber | Hi3655 | SC9863A |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs MediaTek Helio G35
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
3
MediaTek Helio G81 vs Google Tensor G1
4
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
5
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
8
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7360
9
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Unisoc T9100
10
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3