HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
The HiSilicon Kirin 955 and Kirin 980 are two powerful processors developed by HiSilicon. Let's compare their specifications to see the improvements made with the Kirin 980.
Starting with the architecture, the Kirin 955 consists of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Kirin 980 features 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Kirin 980, therefore, offers a more diverse range of cores, including the powerful Cortex-A76, which provides enhanced performance and efficiency compared to the A72 and A53 cores found in the Kirin 955.
Both processors have 8 cores, which allows for improved multitasking and handling of complex tasks. Additionally, they both support the ARMv8-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility and optimization with modern software.
Moving on to the lithography, the Kirin 955 is manufactured using a 16 nm process, while the Kirin 980 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Kirin 980 results in improved power efficiency and better performance. Furthermore, the Kirin 980 contains around 6900 million transistors, which is a substantial increase compared to the 2000 million transistors found in the Kirin 955. This increase allows for more advanced and complex operations to be executed efficiently.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 955 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, while the Kirin 980 has a slightly higher TDP of 6 Watts. Despite the slightly increased power consumption, the Kirin 980 compensates for it by offering significant improvements in performance.
One notable addition to the Kirin 980 is the presence of the HiSilicon Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This dedicated neural processing capability enhances AI-related tasks and improves the efficiency of machine learning algorithms.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 surpasses the Kirin 955 in various aspects. With its more advanced architecture, smaller lithography, increased number of transistors, and the addition of a neural processing unit, the Kirin 980 provides improved performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities.
Starting with the architecture, the Kirin 955 consists of 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Kirin 980 features 2x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, 2x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Kirin 980, therefore, offers a more diverse range of cores, including the powerful Cortex-A76, which provides enhanced performance and efficiency compared to the A72 and A53 cores found in the Kirin 955.
Both processors have 8 cores, which allows for improved multitasking and handling of complex tasks. Additionally, they both support the ARMv8-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility and optimization with modern software.
Moving on to the lithography, the Kirin 955 is manufactured using a 16 nm process, while the Kirin 980 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Kirin 980 results in improved power efficiency and better performance. Furthermore, the Kirin 980 contains around 6900 million transistors, which is a substantial increase compared to the 2000 million transistors found in the Kirin 955. This increase allows for more advanced and complex operations to be executed efficiently.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 955 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, while the Kirin 980 has a slightly higher TDP of 6 Watts. Despite the slightly increased power consumption, the Kirin 980 compensates for it by offering significant improvements in performance.
One notable addition to the Kirin 980 is the presence of the HiSilicon Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit). This dedicated neural processing capability enhances AI-related tasks and improves the efficiency of machine learning algorithms.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 980 surpasses the Kirin 955 in various aspects. With its more advanced architecture, smaller lithography, increased number of transistors, and the addition of a neural processing unit, the Kirin 980 provides improved performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | 6900 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | HiSilicon Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G76 MP10 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 720 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 10 |
Shaders | 64 | 160 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 1.4 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2016 April | 2018 Quarter 4 |
Partnumber | Hi3655 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Helio G85
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Unisoc Tiger T606
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Unisoc Tiger T610
7
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs MediaTek Helio P70
9
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
10
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 9611