HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T700 are both processors used in mobile devices, but they differ in terms of specifications and performance.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features an architecture comprised of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This gives it a total of 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking. With an instruction set of ARMv8-A and a lithography of 16 nm, the Kirin 950 is designed to deliver a balance between power and energy efficiency. It also boasts a high number of transistors, with 2000 million, which enhances its overall performance. In terms of power consumption, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) for the Kirin 950 is 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 offers an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. Like the Kirin 950, it also has 8 cores for seamless multitasking. It features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a lithography of 12 nm, which contributes to improved energy efficiency and performance. However, the TDP for the Tiger T700 is higher at 10 Watts, indicating that it may consume more power compared to the Kirin 950.
In summary, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T700 have 8 cores and ARMv8 instruction sets, they differ in terms of architecture, lithography, and power consumption. The Kirin 950 has a more advanced architecture with a higher clock speed, potentially offering better performance. However, the Tiger T700 has a smaller lithography and may be more energy-efficient. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as performance needs and power efficiency concerns.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features an architecture comprised of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This gives it a total of 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking. With an instruction set of ARMv8-A and a lithography of 16 nm, the Kirin 950 is designed to deliver a balance between power and energy efficiency. It also boasts a high number of transistors, with 2000 million, which enhances its overall performance. In terms of power consumption, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) for the Kirin 950 is 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 offers an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. Like the Kirin 950, it also has 8 cores for seamless multitasking. It features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a lithography of 12 nm, which contributes to improved energy efficiency and performance. However, the TDP for the Tiger T700 is higher at 10 Watts, indicating that it may consume more power compared to the Kirin 950.
In summary, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T700 have 8 cores and ARMv8 instruction sets, they differ in terms of architecture, lithography, and power consumption. The Kirin 950 has a more advanced architecture with a higher clock speed, potentially offering better performance. However, the Tiger T700 has a smaller lithography and may be more energy-efficient. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as performance needs and power efficiency concerns.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2021 March |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
2
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Unisoc SC9863A
3
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Apple A12 Bionic
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
7
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Samsung Exynos 980
8
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
9
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 9825