HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T700 are both processors used in mobile devices, but they differ in terms of specifications and performance.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features an architecture comprised of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This gives it a total of 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking. With an instruction set of ARMv8-A and a lithography of 16 nm, the Kirin 950 is designed to deliver a balance between power and energy efficiency. It also boasts a high number of transistors, with 2000 million, which enhances its overall performance. In terms of power consumption, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) for the Kirin 950 is 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 offers an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. Like the Kirin 950, it also has 8 cores for seamless multitasking. It features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a lithography of 12 nm, which contributes to improved energy efficiency and performance. However, the TDP for the Tiger T700 is higher at 10 Watts, indicating that it may consume more power compared to the Kirin 950.
In summary, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T700 have 8 cores and ARMv8 instruction sets, they differ in terms of architecture, lithography, and power consumption. The Kirin 950 has a more advanced architecture with a higher clock speed, potentially offering better performance. However, the Tiger T700 has a smaller lithography and may be more energy-efficient. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as performance needs and power efficiency concerns.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features an architecture comprised of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This gives it a total of 8 cores, allowing for efficient multitasking. With an instruction set of ARMv8-A and a lithography of 16 nm, the Kirin 950 is designed to deliver a balance between power and energy efficiency. It also boasts a high number of transistors, with 2000 million, which enhances its overall performance. In terms of power consumption, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) for the Kirin 950 is 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 offers an architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. Like the Kirin 950, it also has 8 cores for seamless multitasking. It features an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a lithography of 12 nm, which contributes to improved energy efficiency and performance. However, the TDP for the Tiger T700 is higher at 10 Watts, indicating that it may consume more power compared to the Kirin 950.
In summary, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T700 have 8 cores and ARMv8 instruction sets, they differ in terms of architecture, lithography, and power consumption. The Kirin 950 has a more advanced architecture with a higher clock speed, potentially offering better performance. However, the Tiger T700 has a smaller lithography and may be more energy-efficient. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as performance needs and power efficiency concerns.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| Shaders | 64 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 48MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2015 November | 2021 March |
| Partnumber | Hi3650 | T700 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
3
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs Samsung Exynos 7904
5
Apple A19 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
6
Apple A13 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
7
Unisoc SC7731E vs HiSilicon Kirin 9010
8
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
9
Google Tensor G4 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
10
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400e