HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T618 are both capable processors with unique specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features a total of eight cores - 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. This architecture allows for a balanced performance, combining power and efficiency. Additionally, it employs the ARMv8-A instruction set, providing compatibility and support for various applications. With a lithography of 16 nm, the Kirin 950 achieves a balance between performance and energy efficiency. It houses 2000 million transistors, enhancing its processing capability. Moreover, it has a TDP rating of 5 Watts, indicating its low power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 also boasts eight cores, consisting of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This architecture ensures a blend of powerful and power-efficient performance. The ARMv8.2-A instruction set supported by the T618 enables compatibility with numerous software. With a smaller lithography of 12 nm, this processor further enhances its energy efficiency. It has a TDP rating of 10 Watts, indicating a slightly higher power consumption. Additionally, it features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which can accelerate artificial intelligence tasks.
When comparing the two processors, it is evident that they offer different strengths. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 focuses on energy efficiency while maintaining a decent level of performance. With its ARMv8-A instruction set and balanced core architecture, it provides reliability and compatibility. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 emphasizes a blend of power and energy efficiency. Its architecture combines performance cores with power-efficient cores, and it also features a Neural Processing Unit for AI tasks.
Overall, the choice between the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T618 depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the user. If energy efficiency and compatibility are crucial, the Kirin 950 is a suitable option. However, if a balance between power and efficiency, along with AI capabilities, is desired, the Tiger T618 would be a better choice.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it features a total of eight cores - 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. This architecture allows for a balanced performance, combining power and efficiency. Additionally, it employs the ARMv8-A instruction set, providing compatibility and support for various applications. With a lithography of 16 nm, the Kirin 950 achieves a balance between performance and energy efficiency. It houses 2000 million transistors, enhancing its processing capability. Moreover, it has a TDP rating of 5 Watts, indicating its low power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 also boasts eight cores, consisting of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This architecture ensures a blend of powerful and power-efficient performance. The ARMv8.2-A instruction set supported by the T618 enables compatibility with numerous software. With a smaller lithography of 12 nm, this processor further enhances its energy efficiency. It has a TDP rating of 10 Watts, indicating a slightly higher power consumption. Additionally, it features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which can accelerate artificial intelligence tasks.
When comparing the two processors, it is evident that they offer different strengths. The HiSilicon Kirin 950 focuses on energy efficiency while maintaining a decent level of performance. With its ARMv8-A instruction set and balanced core architecture, it provides reliability and compatibility. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T618 emphasizes a blend of power and energy efficiency. Its architecture combines performance cores with power-efficient cores, and it also features a Neural Processing Unit for AI tasks.
Overall, the choice between the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T618 depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the user. If energy efficiency and compatibility are crucial, the Kirin 950 is a suitable option. However, if a balance between power and efficiency, along with AI capabilities, is desired, the Tiger T618 would be a better choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2019 August |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
2
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
3
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
4
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
6
Apple A10 Fusion vs Apple A14 Bionic
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Helio P70
8
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
9
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Apple A15 Bionic
10
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200