HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T610 are both processors used in mobile devices, but they have different specifications that set them apart.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 has four Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz.
Both processors have eight cores in total, but they differ in terms of their primary architecture. The Kirin 950 includes higher-performing Cortex-A72 cores, while the Tiger T610 integrates more power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores.
The instruction set for the Kirin 950 is ARMv8-A, which allows for enhanced processing capabilities and efficiency. In contrast, the Tiger T610 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 950 is based on a 16 nm process, while the Tiger T610 is manufactured on a 12 nm process. This means that the Tiger T610 has a smaller node size, which can lead to improved power efficiency and potentially better overall performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 950 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, whereas the Tiger T610 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 offers a combination of high-performance Cortex-A72 cores and power-efficient Cortex-A53 cores, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 incorporates more power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores and slightly older Cortex-A75 cores. The Tiger T610 also has a smaller lithography size, which may lead to improved efficiency. However, the Kirin 950 has a lower TDP, which can potentially result in better battery life and thermal management. The final choice would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 has four Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz.
Both processors have eight cores in total, but they differ in terms of their primary architecture. The Kirin 950 includes higher-performing Cortex-A72 cores, while the Tiger T610 integrates more power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores.
The instruction set for the Kirin 950 is ARMv8-A, which allows for enhanced processing capabilities and efficiency. In contrast, the Tiger T610 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 950 is based on a 16 nm process, while the Tiger T610 is manufactured on a 12 nm process. This means that the Tiger T610 has a smaller node size, which can lead to improved power efficiency and potentially better overall performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 950 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, whereas the Tiger T610 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 offers a combination of high-performance Cortex-A72 cores and power-efficient Cortex-A53 cores, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 incorporates more power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores and slightly older Cortex-A75 cores. The Tiger T610 also has a smaller lithography size, which may lead to improved efficiency. However, the Kirin 950 has a lower TDP, which can potentially result in better battery life and thermal management. The final choice would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2019 June |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
6
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs MediaTek Helio G25
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
10
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Samsung Exynos 2200