HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tiger T610 are both processors used in mobile devices, but they have different specifications that set them apart.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 has four Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz.
Both processors have eight cores in total, but they differ in terms of their primary architecture. The Kirin 950 includes higher-performing Cortex-A72 cores, while the Tiger T610 integrates more power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores.
The instruction set for the Kirin 950 is ARMv8-A, which allows for enhanced processing capabilities and efficiency. In contrast, the Tiger T610 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 950 is based on a 16 nm process, while the Tiger T610 is manufactured on a 12 nm process. This means that the Tiger T610 has a smaller node size, which can lead to improved power efficiency and potentially better overall performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 950 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, whereas the Tiger T610 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 offers a combination of high-performance Cortex-A72 cores and power-efficient Cortex-A53 cores, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 incorporates more power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores and slightly older Cortex-A75 cores. The Tiger T610 also has a smaller lithography size, which may lead to improved efficiency. However, the Kirin 950 has a lower TDP, which can potentially result in better battery life and thermal management. The final choice would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 has four Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz.
Both processors have eight cores in total, but they differ in terms of their primary architecture. The Kirin 950 includes higher-performing Cortex-A72 cores, while the Tiger T610 integrates more power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores.
The instruction set for the Kirin 950 is ARMv8-A, which allows for enhanced processing capabilities and efficiency. In contrast, the Tiger T610 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 950 is based on a 16 nm process, while the Tiger T610 is manufactured on a 12 nm process. This means that the Tiger T610 has a smaller node size, which can lead to improved power efficiency and potentially better overall performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 950 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, whereas the Tiger T610 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 offers a combination of high-performance Cortex-A72 cores and power-efficient Cortex-A53 cores, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 incorporates more power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores and slightly older Cortex-A75 cores. The Tiger T610 also has a smaller lithography size, which may lead to improved efficiency. However, the Kirin 950 has a lower TDP, which can potentially result in better battery life and thermal management. The final choice would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| Shaders | 64 | 32 |
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2400x1080 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2015 November | 2019 June |
| Partnumber | Hi3650 | T610 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Unisoc Tiger T612
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs MediaTek Helio P65
4
MediaTek Helio P60 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Helio P90
6
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Apple A16 Bionic
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Apple M1 (iPad)
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Helio P22
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Samsung Exynos 7420