HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc Tiger T606 are both processors used in mobile devices, but they have distinct specifications that set them apart.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it boasts an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. These eight cores, along with the ARMv8-A instruction set, deliver efficient and powerful performance. The Kirin 950 is built on a 16nm lithography process and contains approximately 2000 million transistors. With a TDP of 5 Watts, this processor is designed to offer a balance between power consumption and performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features an architecture consisting of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination of cores, along with the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, provides a balance between power and energy efficiency. The Tiger T606 is fabricated using a 12nm lithography process, resulting in a more power-efficient design. However, the TDP of this processor is slightly higher than the Kirin 950, sitting at 10 Watts.
In terms of core count, both processors boast eight cores, which enables them to handle multiple tasks simultaneously and ensures smooth multitasking capabilities. However, the Kirin 950 offers a greater clock speed on its high-performance cores, providing faster single-core performance.
When it comes to instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8 instruction set, which means they can execute 64-bit instructions efficiently. However, the Tiger T606 supports the slightly more advanced ARMv8.2-A, which may bring some additional benefits in terms of performance and efficiency.
Considering the lithography process, the Tiger T606 has a slight advantage with its 12nm process compared to the Kirin 950's 16nm process. This suggests that the Tiger T606 may offer better power efficiency, is capable of dissipating heat more effectively, and potentially allows for higher clock speeds.
Overall, while both processors offer respectable specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 stands out with its higher clock speeds on the high-performance cores and lower TDP. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606's more advanced instruction set and improved lithography process may provide it with better overall performance and power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as power consumption, performance, and cost.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it boasts an architecture of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. These eight cores, along with the ARMv8-A instruction set, deliver efficient and powerful performance. The Kirin 950 is built on a 16nm lithography process and contains approximately 2000 million transistors. With a TDP of 5 Watts, this processor is designed to offer a balance between power consumption and performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 features an architecture consisting of 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination of cores, along with the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, provides a balance between power and energy efficiency. The Tiger T606 is fabricated using a 12nm lithography process, resulting in a more power-efficient design. However, the TDP of this processor is slightly higher than the Kirin 950, sitting at 10 Watts.
In terms of core count, both processors boast eight cores, which enables them to handle multiple tasks simultaneously and ensures smooth multitasking capabilities. However, the Kirin 950 offers a greater clock speed on its high-performance cores, providing faster single-core performance.
When it comes to instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8 instruction set, which means they can execute 64-bit instructions efficiently. However, the Tiger T606 supports the slightly more advanced ARMv8.2-A, which may bring some additional benefits in terms of performance and efficiency.
Considering the lithography process, the Tiger T606 has a slight advantage with its 12nm process compared to the Kirin 950's 16nm process. This suggests that the Tiger T606 may offer better power efficiency, is capable of dissipating heat more effectively, and potentially allows for higher clock speeds.
Overall, while both processors offer respectable specifications, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 stands out with its higher clock speeds on the high-performance cores and lower TDP. However, the Unisoc Tiger T606's more advanced instruction set and improved lithography process may provide it with better overall performance and power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on specific requirements and priorities, such as power consumption, performance, and cost.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x900@90Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2021 October |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Apple A13 Bionic
2
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
3
Unisoc SC9863A vs Samsung Exynos 7870
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
7
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
8
Samsung Exynos 980 vs MediaTek Helio G96
9
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Google Tensor G3
10
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Apple A16 Bionic