HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G processors, there are several key specifications to consider.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 features a combination of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G boasts 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With this configuration, the Tanggula T770 5G has a higher clock speed, potentially offering better performance.
Both processors have 8 cores and utilize the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 is manufactured using a 16 nm lithography, while the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G is built on a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The smaller lithography allows for greater power efficiency and potentially better performance.
When it comes to power consumption, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 watts, indicating that they are designed to operate with low power consumption. This can be beneficial for devices that prioritize battery life.
One notable difference between these two processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G. This dedicated hardware component is designed to accelerate artificial intelligence tasks, offering enhanced processing capabilities for AI-related applications.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G processors share similarities such as 8 cores and a 5-watt TDP, the Tanggula T770 5G stands out with its higher clock speeds, more advanced 6 nm lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. These features suggest that the Tanggula T770 5G may offer better overall performance and efficiency, particularly in tasks involving AI processing.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 features a combination of 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G boasts 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 core, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With this configuration, the Tanggula T770 5G has a higher clock speed, potentially offering better performance.
Both processors have 8 cores and utilize the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 is manufactured using a 16 nm lithography, while the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G is built on a more advanced 6 nm lithography. The smaller lithography allows for greater power efficiency and potentially better performance.
When it comes to power consumption, both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 watts, indicating that they are designed to operate with low power consumption. This can be beneficial for devices that prioritize battery life.
One notable difference between these two processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G. This dedicated hardware component is designed to accelerate artificial intelligence tasks, offering enhanced processing capabilities for AI-related applications.
In conclusion, while the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G processors share similarities such as 8 cores and a 5-watt TDP, the Tanggula T770 5G stands out with its higher clock speeds, more advanced 6 nm lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. These features suggest that the Tanggula T770 5G may offer better overall performance and efficiency, particularly in tasks involving AI processing.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 32 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2021 February |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | T770, Tiger T7520 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Apple A16 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
3
MediaTek Helio G35 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Apple A17 Pro
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Apple A11 Bionic
7
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
8
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
9
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
10
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs MediaTek Helio P90