HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc SC9863A are two processors that offer unique features and capabilities. Let's compare their specifications to understand their differences.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it is built using a 16 nm lithography and features a total of 8 cores. The CPU architecture comprises 4 Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This combination provides a balanced performance, with the higher clocked Cortex-A72 cores handling more demanding tasks. The instruction set follows ARMv8-A guidelines. Additionally, the Kirin 950 has 2000 million transistors and a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts. These specifications make it a powerful and efficient processor.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A is based on a 28 nm lithography and also has 8 cores. This processor utilizes a different CPU architecture, consisting of 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.2 GHz. This arrangement provides a balance between power efficiency and performance. The Unisoc SC9863A follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which enhances its compatibility with newer software and applications. It also has a TDP of 3 Watts. One notable feature of the SC9863A is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enables it to accelerate artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc SC9863A differ in various ways. The Kirin 950 offers a 16 nm lithography, higher clock speeds, and a mix of Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A53 cores. However, the Unisoc SC9863A has a larger number of transistors and a more power-efficient 28 nm lithography. It also includes an NPU for accelerated AI processing. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on specific requirements for performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 950, it is built using a 16 nm lithography and features a total of 8 cores. The CPU architecture comprises 4 Cortex-A72 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This combination provides a balanced performance, with the higher clocked Cortex-A72 cores handling more demanding tasks. The instruction set follows ARMv8-A guidelines. Additionally, the Kirin 950 has 2000 million transistors and a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts. These specifications make it a powerful and efficient processor.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9863A is based on a 28 nm lithography and also has 8 cores. This processor utilizes a different CPU architecture, consisting of 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.2 GHz. This arrangement provides a balance between power efficiency and performance. The Unisoc SC9863A follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which enhances its compatibility with newer software and applications. It also has a TDP of 3 Watts. One notable feature of the SC9863A is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enables it to accelerate artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 950 and the Unisoc SC9863A differ in various ways. The Kirin 950 offers a 16 nm lithography, higher clock speeds, and a mix of Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A53 cores. However, the Unisoc SC9863A has a larger number of transistors and a more power-efficient 28 nm lithography. It also includes an NPU for accelerated AI processing. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on specific requirements for performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 2000 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T880 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 11.2 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2015 November | 2018 November |
Partnumber | Hi3650 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek Helio G25
2
MediaTek Helio G36 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
4
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Samsung Exynos 8895
5
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
6
MediaTek Helio P90 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
7
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs MediaTek Helio G90
9
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Apple A10 Fusion
10
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695